From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/7] RISC-V: Treat IPIs as normal Linux IRQs
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:18:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bkoomn4h.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129142449.886518-5-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:24:46 +0000,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, the RISC-V kernel provides arch specific hooks (i.e.
> struct riscv_ipi_ops) to register IPI handling methods. The stats
> gathering of IPIs is also arch specific in the RISC-V kernel.
>
> Other architectures (such as ARM, ARM64, and MIPS) have moved away
> from custom arch specific IPI handling methods. Currently, these
> architectures have Linux irqchip drivers providing a range of Linux
> IRQ numbers to be used as IPIs and IPI triggering is done using
> generic IPI APIs. This approach allows architectures to treat IPIs
> as normal Linux IRQs and IPI stats gathering is done by the generic
> Linux IRQ subsystem.
>
> We extend the RISC-V IPI handling as-per above approach so that arch
> specific IPI handling methods (struct riscv_ipi_ops) can be removed
> and the IPI handling is done through the Linux IRQ subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 10 +-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h | 35 ++++---
> arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu-hotplug.c | 3 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c | 3 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/sbi-ipi.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c | 106 +++-----------------
> arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 155 +++++++++++++++---------------
> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 5 +-
> drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c | 65 ++++++++++---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c | 55 +++++------
> 13 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 235 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/sbi-ipi.c
>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi-ipi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi-ipi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6466706b03a7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi-ipi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Multiplex several IPIs over a single HW IPI.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Ventana Micro Systems Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "riscv: " fmt
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> +
> +static int sbi_ipi_virq;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(int, sbi_ipi_dummy_dev);
> +
> +static irqreturn_t sbi_ipi_handle(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + csr_clear(CSR_IP, IE_SIE);
> + ipi_mux_process();
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
Urgh... I really wish I hadn't seen this. This requires a chained
handler. You had it before, and yet you dropped it. Why?
Either you call ipi_mux_process() from your root interrupt controller,
or you implement a chained handler. But not this.
Same thing about the clint stuff.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-30 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 14:24 [PATCH v13 0/7] RISC-V IPI Improvements Anup Patel
2022-11-29 14:24 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] RISC-V: Clear SIP bit only when using SBI IPI operations Anup Patel
2022-11-29 14:24 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] irqchip/riscv-intc: Allow drivers to directly discover INTC hwnode Anup Patel
2022-11-29 14:24 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] genirq: Add mechanism to multiplex a single HW IPI Anup Patel
2022-11-30 14:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-30 17:03 ` Anup Patel
2022-11-29 14:24 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] RISC-V: Treat IPIs as normal Linux IRQs Anup Patel
2022-11-30 16:18 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-11-30 17:14 ` Anup Patel
2022-11-30 18:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-30 18:14 ` Anup Patel
2022-11-29 14:24 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] RISC-V: Allow marking IPIs as suitable for remote FENCEs Anup Patel
2022-11-29 14:24 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] RISC-V: Use IPIs for remote TLB flush when possible Anup Patel
2022-11-29 14:24 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] RISC-V: Use IPIs for remote icache " Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86bkoomn4h.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox