From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B5AC52D7C for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:10:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=0mHdbne3sz5EwshBoLaBxtMeaDdqixfOr4A6FEYJsQo=; b=0R/2Rsm7Fwl1iW x29Y/Wr4eLbmEXJuDZw1B74RAAtcaYe26yH2CAfdvI+xTpqRHglU1owybR+HuZS1ss6qKlfcw7gD1 dq2K+jplhtxXkSVg4DGtqR/RrYUNEPUzu4ElJGX8KSLeaxLNr7q/v2BloupJ86RvYjcUgh9eLjABh HkdZz5Rys4MgpU0lPq7ooj45d1nVNxPQQrShu7EOqIxGZ2LMoH/ryquEdnhZOoKPASXMwC9kaMl41 ScEKKyPMuafTz+/PoUkFQ45705ftQJouAL8fieLgH6RYcOg6O5IV8QQSOeT2c2S1tBRnMwhVZ7yUA uKE9j+3Hj3QxheiHeKgg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1seevg-0000000AjD5-206K; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:10:32 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1seevc-0000000AjCK-0o2B for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:10:31 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1723745426; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aIcN+dIpsXv32UGdjkrhLz6191NfIjPhsUje1gE84Ek=; b=YJGog9NahT5FBJYT42XzusFUmigYmnDfd+JLK0/zYmUsEGcqIJW+41DEd4KzKkCmff4+rO 5vVQ1dELVh4U/zx3KO2t8XEuUI67pTEg9DCfaEODuKkSo/vpjrX3nbpfFeFS1sVR+gVC46 3M/wd89TS2e9kVk4j/qZOUi9Mf8RdhSYbdre6evbVFfj2+69PBAk0w3Y6PmiszOgQI1r6r yisI8NXFi1v9PSSpgOfG0rYUgbC0sg6jDlnjcYeyO26cUUaIfC9pqAr180iHr46d+GCogZ PVspcb4B5A2GWMaHHgC92UBBi1fYOtkGt8HPXXXJ25FaFWntURDc9MP7KLd4wA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1723745426; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aIcN+dIpsXv32UGdjkrhLz6191NfIjPhsUje1gE84Ek=; b=Pz9qjuQUyR8OhF/TBmmZiUXsC7RCoLOjJO846L4GaTFJPylLrqwjnO/HyVujGQl/laZYwe L6dRlDcMQbQ8sUBg== To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Renner Berthing , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, apatel@ventanamicro.com, Paul Walmsley , samuel.holland@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] Fix Allwinner D1 boot regression In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 20:10:25 +0200 Message-ID: <8734n5mzce.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240815_111028_399220_BEF41DB4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 15 2024 at 10:51, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:30:48 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote: >> I'm very much inclined to take the reverts right now, send them to Linus >> for -rc5 tagged with cc: stable and ignore/nak any irqchip related riscv >> patches until the next merge window is over. > > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt > > if you want to take the revert. I'm happy to wait a week and see whether someone gets that CLINT hack working or as I suggested the D1 PLIC early probe quirk. > IIUC the patch above doesn't actually fix it, that's what led to just > sending the reverts -- at least reverts are better than breaking users. > I'll post over there too... Right. We figured that out by now :) > And it's no big deal if we're in the doghouse for a bit. Regressions > should get fixed faster than this, so we deserve it. For a week I consider you probationers :) > Probably also another sign we're way too focused on getting new features > merged, as that's coming at the expense of making existing platforms > work. IMO we've been way too focused on getting support for specs that > don't even have implementations, and not enough on building real working > systems. RISCV is not alone with that. This whole industry is nuts about features and forgets the stuff what matters. Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv