From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B281B606A31B for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 21:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=mnWmSnrb; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2020 header.b=oY6hUsF2; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=2020e header.b=Kzv9OIGZ DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Owner; bh=zL9rnEBgCorJwH0i7yi/WEHfLi4NMu+uDwCBL/0qwH0=; b=mnWmSnrb6RreiMEvcyPbyKFPIT TEw6vglCqPcddawF33QnQD+UaZjSxCGVPWu3N3WhzsNgEransdxbn6+qIS2UD2EtLgExbD3UKQDwW MPWQmb44LOAnnkdoCYJgmK5ZgtaPH2n6k0Ks41xKLOiomcNGgFZZYZRwUq9Aa7c+F/WQzmdSs1VIQ i7mqrx8RostYydJryScSKMzfV0+pJrIL/627XUtJGQf4TaWzi90ly4IQDojl6Mcd5ysTod66Y5qMX hccx5RDebPyCS7zV6XDrjyfAtIUx9EXK0957JMEUPdMdJL7UmUaAc/dU9lo+3qJPgTNeHzNXVDwHT JTd+PQQQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xP5Ik-0000000AlQh-0I1x; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 21:47:18 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xP5Ig-0000000AlQC-2oat for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 21:47:16 +0000 From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1793915229; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fWEq7ANjuAxT0SsQWCA6NNqlsk5fygPVddvQlmahPzI=; b=oY6hUsF2Jx+NRaoHk81kEfoNEY+zkReOYRbyvhWrJy4CqaCVDc/BA2X+16JJnZXeTPyy5K rnI7LOgaXmNRBNvXnGM+EgGTyQOBt8xy/GPCJJQgaXzTHvc7YbxvJ4P6tk8gUAgkWAlsmf sNr9aArKBucyyonucqvG9lGYA164GHmgyRp09lEuQIQWmaIW1MF/zmnBWSXF/Xj/QF5MUF X4yocNFsZcXQ+IAchbLZ4X70PhEHRpRBxSGeefm1GAopDbSo8s3fyeOCVTnH/EEe1rA1ra ApljPya+O4QdZIWd0iQpY1uie2Jn9IvWO6fry+v2OK1AqHjstIqp+DhfZfJCIA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1793915229; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fWEq7ANjuAxT0SsQWCA6NNqlsk5fygPVddvQlmahPzI=; b=Kzv9OIGZXm3GfDja/e1kGOPpANmqPEdnG3/UWpLWsZ3yo+uGUbKbLNxSzBkZkOCvBFQ7qN Yv7wNl+KWROkx+Aw== To: Daniel Matyas , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Daniel Matyas , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alex Lanzano , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] staging: fbtft: Moving fb_ili9341 (and others) to DRM In-Reply-To: <20261105201154.37294-2-matyasdaniel006@gmail.com> References: <20261105201154.37294-2-matyasdaniel006@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 22:47:06 +0100 Message-ID: <874idv2bol.fsf@yellow.woof> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20261105_134715_016525_81E80537 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.15 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 Daniel Matyas writes: > Questions: > a) Is removing fb_ili9341 acceptable, pointing users of other ILI9341 > modules to panel-mipi-dbi? The KD233 node would then have no driver. > b) Or should KD233 panel support go into a DRM driver first? I don't have > its init sequence or physical size, or the board... > c) Is removal of all of fbtft already planned? > d) Several other fbtft drivers have drm counterparts. Should I inspect those > to see if removal is needed? IIRC the main reason fbtft needs to stay is because it supports parallel interface which is missing in the DRM drivers. Nam _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv