From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8635C6379D for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B10A2145D for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="oLNqTgwY"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="LAo7PDsp"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="J6tpgYEs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4B10A2145D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=5AWZqKsSa8qWBbZI9LSMo7EQtOYcOgOFEwZXxNac4Pg=; b=oLNqTgwYUYfs5ELJC/ZQrvYKY 7X7zBddFIg+KXLRG7I2idSbDbFLU6VHEZoCFBgd1ERkSva+afF6bolk1bbnaYeuDG7gNh95UgtLT5 zcnjm1e2441HuX0HTLstJe5clumzaUmCIThHji76AYTbW4gO68uSPYgZ48BZj5cbxuc0e2RcZHLm+ Wkfo/kSNkcu4bfmZAaej6cP8p862/gsYvUyB6XmjCpJIPoa/OQ4bW6LOOxnplCfVvj6n9Zv8ph+6W F7WE16DY3Nco1HJWzdIUA+GstDVkZR1i+VNxzUTFpG64ASPowkNJ76tn6Ua01PRgyzxGjWlLpL4NE 7TindGiTQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kiE6j-0000Mz-Pv; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:02:33 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kiE6h-0000MV-Es for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:02:32 +0000 From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1606384947; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2qit9PkXxg14UDk7jOPp9fXICEg92L6laUwiDD8YMJQ=; b=LAo7PDsp9ozV4VuqR9/2rFDbQPZQHhFnGhWL6Yk3kOz0m10CfqeDF3P6M5CQZgaK8sWyyj +GA7AC9BAKXQG+LasQUlnLuRl1EdY6pWiNX6nmQ2HzU6CW+fnYzX+asfnhEO6SRBFnJrTo O3wlkd+ONn8TTWGz1SMHHKpvEvT/6F8d14aG1nBihwn8DLjR8+aIo/khC2V82bPtzfaYHx l1m8hMLiFqnTfe1oTmam1Hp5aRKomAhFgQ3H9Bi4Ik7mw8vsrPPdSRziuIbKx4UGeJn9v5 XAOmgV87+pTzQlgOAckTEYc4azM8ZnhhVsRKfesltGq9GizBS/gh/isNldoiaA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1606384947; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2qit9PkXxg14UDk7jOPp9fXICEg92L6laUwiDD8YMJQ=; b=J6tpgYEsL+02anV8qVIMn71h9RO1bJclL44zJJi/HBVvdQQIosNypjius68PynNB5ur59E s/9AlJ7xIqSoiOBw== To: Kefeng Wang , Atish Patra Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: Fix __show_regs printing formats In-Reply-To: References: <20201124112054.106960-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <20201124112054.106960-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:08:26 +0106 Message-ID: <87d000cu6l.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201126_050231_681915_88551B82 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.62 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Petr Mladek , linux-riscv , Albert Ou , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org +Petr On 2020-11-26, Kefeng Wang wrote: > On 2020/11/26 6:58, Atish Patra wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:17 AM Kefeng Wang wrote: >>> Using printk directly and align the printing formats. >>> >> Why switch to printk ? IIRC, pr_* is preferred over printk for any new code. > > The stack output is strange, that is why I move to printk, and the old > kernel looks good. This is just a quick response to let you know I can reproduce the issue and I am investigating. @Petr: The proposed change and output difference is here [0]. John Ogness [0] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2020-November/003320.html _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv