From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14569C02188 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:53:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=GiqLdfWsTx4moWp+SGfc4at++nHdnSXcpBubcHNOhNk=; b=YIn5XD8v1irfYY uRfPNhGKKo7WD7S89FGpX8lJ9TQbIr/9riz8ZJJRljUC91Q5/A33D97lydvCASN4yFAD6kATs08z2 4VSorxw06B7A2WaoO6xqEKKC3rePlfsnGoPfqeZN00doZ6tnDs+2S8HKG4cj0Pjbjw7qMbu1pu3WJ vyizS0McAOUqlTqI3kf3IpYpFopx3Sd1wRUghyLNuNzGyxAY9XrEJmRrifPY0hhQdIaDsbJDItj5I pF2i0mK3qdOqzas2NsqQvXA0I3KAS6U6awqk5D8nx85So8NFjlVeG4jvOF3GEHI9EMS4lcJjvWmm8 QqOj11oVY9Ne90foNQMA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tcTIH-00000002xLm-1Utm; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:53:05 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tcTHe-00000002wzg-1Eab for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 17:52:27 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1738000344; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TOlQGAOrFNEkdLS0RWXAijH0T2zahF0AUY6O5HkV56U=; b=iJqw0Y/ISbwn6iZ+5Asg5nc8WdREWNtcRf0RX6tK26ZEzj7vdEd70HMF3JhU+kEdjLR1Jl coTVpiF9pctggg7wIxgOXKoGlPWWNsOpfFtjqf7ozwPw5YGUAV/uhRdU3NPEKx6aZWEiaa i0Okvfse8KwVtd4dbd2EswJ1xXVT8a36W+z98fIHmuadfbAeG26XymgMZLhjCojSrhBWZ5 q+9vERIYrYf57BvWzl+xR7koza2s/+69cqmyRoK1LOMLgUEBZvUgFDJYwPQYPv3RqL7TbK j3XNAYpQOPbMl+3BXKFkKJKxjTTozo7zkHkZWkkPa4/VJeuslqqhW3CnGdw9Rw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1738000344; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TOlQGAOrFNEkdLS0RWXAijH0T2zahF0AUY6O5HkV56U=; b=VFGL8DfTCdjujN4Ijpccci2cB2onhOkb3QVnd7xcTSPXNbKCs5gGr4FnSFhU9dp8WAtZWj wg6WGWTG7pvYutDA== To: Vladimir Kondratiev , Rob Herring Cc: Anup Patel , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add risc-v,aplic hart indexes In-Reply-To: References: <20250109113814.3254448-1-vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com> <20250109113814.3254448-2-vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com> <20250110162235.GB2975507-robh@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:52:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87ed0o87qg.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250127_095226_474078_D22406DA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.35 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jan 12 2025 at 08:38, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: >>> Document optional property "riscv,hart-indexes" > >>That is obvious reading the diff. Why do you need this? > > I say it briefly in the description for the property. > In more details this is described in the other patch comment > - for code that uses this property. > Is it better to repeat more detailed description in this patch > comment as well? Obviously. Each patch has to be self contained and explain what it is about. Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv