From: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
"liaochang (A)" <liaochang1@huawei.com>,
palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
mhiramat@kernel.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
penberg@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: kprobe: Optimize kprobe with accurate atomicity
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:56:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edrc2c6s.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9fm+6LPXgtDSma/@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> writes:
>> ...and stop_machine() with !PREEMPTION is broken as well, when you're
>> replacing multiple instructions (see Mark's post at [1]). The
>> stop_machine() dance might work when you're replacing *one* instruction,
>> not multiple as in the RISC-V case. I'll expand on this in a comment in
>> the OPTPROBES v6 series.
>
> Just to clarify, my comments in [1] were assuming that stop_machine() was not
> used, in which case there is a problem with or without PREEMPTION.
>
> I believe that when using stop_machine(), the !PREEMPTION case is fine, since
> stop_machine() schedules work rather than running work in IRQ context on the
> back of an IPI, so no CPUs should be mid-sequnce during the patching, and it's
> not possible for there to be threads which are preempted mid-sequence.
TIL! stop_cpus() highlights that very nicely. Thanks for clearing that
out! That's good news; That means that this fix [4] should go in.
> That all said, IIUC optprobes is going to disappear once fprobe is ready
> everywhere, so that might be moot.
Yes (However, the stop_machine()/!PREEMPTION issue was with ftrace).
Björn
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230107133549.4192639-2-guoren@kernel.org/
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-26 16:15 [PATCH] riscv: kprobe: Optimize kprobe with accurate atomicity guoren
2023-01-28 3:52 ` liaochang (A)
2023-01-28 4:45 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-30 15:28 ` Björn Töpel
2023-01-30 15:49 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-30 16:56 ` Björn Töpel [this message]
2023-01-31 1:48 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-31 7:12 ` Björn Töpel
2023-01-31 8:30 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-31 10:33 ` Mark Rutland
2023-02-16 15:23 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-02-20 10:35 ` Mark Rutland
2023-02-21 1:30 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-31 1:01 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-31 1:09 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-31 7:03 ` Björn Töpel
2023-01-31 8:27 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-31 6:40 ` Björn Töpel
2023-01-31 8:15 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-31 10:56 ` Andrea Parri
2023-01-31 13:23 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-16 7:54 ` Björn Töpel
2023-02-17 2:28 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-17 7:32 ` Björn Töpel
2023-02-21 1:56 ` Guo Ren
2023-02-16 15:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-02-21 0:57 ` Guo Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edrc2c6s.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us \
--to=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox