From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC4ABCCD199 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:29:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Ik5jFvV69fs4izGYCvjxC56zQO3650qSmOLGBZm673o=; b=ncX39BMdOyAt95 Z9gnT0XpwXlHqMVA2CISf8wEYr8wDtvNJBjZTYqv9JhJrfNLQbPut3+u2TxAE9d99YtWTGLev5dBb sUKsi3rvW6Wu6ZK5jv0RiVHXKSoZtoXGarS0ypR/oqSX7yrlLMKvXWwF3fXsyPY20gX0yKKD3ctTj Nj3bQGCJbQfI21DLbtAu/o7d7/CQk4o6LU4RryXO/JoqWnoRAVZDj3eR8Dz39DtCZnKx1PiTiunOR KZM9Xwc7JDPgT78XEKOB4mxwVME91Gf/0a4+NWeCO5JTGRM53/9okzFAusYdcNTMxKgnXYiyFZaBV d+PHevEkC0v2dD2aF9Pg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v9kW0-00000007veE-1dre; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:29:04 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v9kVx-00000007vdt-45i0 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:29:03 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1760707740; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FCb6l5ObniXxTIJOJBll3JU9Fu/sYJFKIcRGtHY6frc=; b=p7FlZSQcAvWYom6XD4RC1BVusPQNBd77BuXglxpg+DCDbQRSihlZad8s8KkFq8GzZ5iZIe 2HrVaHGAht83q1/fXEHKj72H9MFP1752bzcQKbS3B/bO6sZlyWs8G+h895amFBLurzAry5 0QxOLP6shaQDSAdcons0opzYr3pnqDtXzimvuHl5c5f3b9wAj0eg8TArIxrwc4vnbIw8YH 1nwqaBQyHsT92OTeqb0azRGz05XF3UNvI9Rqzjeu7rrGY1rDd8y0/ZhnVQPjTGLHkHJi8N 7PX/F07JCYIFyWiBOOYu2u8+piT2Iw6UkCct//Ed9ip/LG5WMAokADy2EDPvEA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1760707740; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FCb6l5ObniXxTIJOJBll3JU9Fu/sYJFKIcRGtHY6frc=; b=0oOt3xZiIZOnwlVFS3EqsCKSMb5+HZD9ZLIItx6umf2eU145EyuqLUWvc0JOH6XIQPhxLJ 5ZcJL149p74D26DA== To: Charles Mirabile Cc: alex@ghiti.fr, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, cmirabil@redhat.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dramforever@live.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, lzampier@redhat.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, robh@kernel.org, samuel.holland@sifive.com, zhangxincheng@ultrarisc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] irqchip/plic: add support for UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC In-Reply-To: <20251016195902.338629-1-cmirabil@redhat.com> References: <87h5vy20o9.ffs@tglx> <20251016195902.338629-1-cmirabil@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 15:28:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87plalzmg4.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251017_062902_175441_2DC2E620 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 16 2025 at 15:58, Charles Mirabile wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 07:53:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What do you think about the attached patch (it should be not corrupt :^) > I think I adressed your concerns, and I ran it through clang-format too. > > I folded everything into one diff for ease of review, but when we send it > officially there will be a separate patch for the caching refactor. Looks about right and it's a net win for everyone due to the suspend path cleanup. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv