From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3CACAC5B5 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:19:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=d7Jr88S8SRl7ZbdyRrBVWmLPKyKuBl6iGYzYipakMVU=; b=Gxby42ljIsUzKb wOpjRkHo9Lbjj8mNOmRfjFeTF/GicbgY0QFtrx1j2vjo3gnLG4Y+KvNzKJX/pBjZ3TGWIhtO2T+MY VLP+AQYMcftfmvxNBEjQVpJAT3Q2PbOiFfVWxCmJSKecdrXHfDT9jf0aAQFtFeqCmFWnsw4nnCJmy FiBDlv2QY3EfGWeGRrqP/boXSxfyYtFLbLYcfEtNZCnGyPzcCgnWkPAQXIK2Oxt7VwVla76mZO98a SMuCtZC/B6araRui19rZ5d0JpCh3P+QhNzEIDqyvlXQCf5LCeTYF9cppM85VKZD+e8LbgDISlBcaT gqDh5EQGTy+a6FXZYGZw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v3Ayj-000000029nz-37Nd; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:19:33 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v3Ayh-000000029lf-1HaM for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:19:32 +0000 From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1759141167; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=na+z28tfujvUbYZGUn5Elyo9Cu+dfw5ocKOwLyEHUIo=; b=13tNo2p8nc6zWD3ftjF+Dm/6rnWtaYz72CxAujFLiWRtOdHF7CfjNgDNTdS0zMymUk/qFT W2ho8qe98rmUe819LIUtyI+/FGjlsI29o5AjIxzh4ZigSOKdb7k8lchTQ9kh8g+1aBFtxY o96KFoQiaqHH76JByvV3iOqlPrYj7ZFWsQGNPXOd+BOHUF+KyIe2hc4qX58WPmPveMbud0 mCUEj+1bPclkDzlzEffHuoBKjFLDVBIfForNaOCb+vjtYJRCsk3W34O40hWkGXAQOPnpz1 fnnyme24yyXqIuYQqfIZJPsk6eqW+4/9EIBGpJWC5yCuTujXpp/6pGhKF2qd3A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1759141167; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=na+z28tfujvUbYZGUn5Elyo9Cu+dfw5ocKOwLyEHUIo=; b=+Syr7Wiki9tBCENI51Zw8YlRdpoNLpmUSdrdBLrUrpUoArChrosAoh4awSkFPiDT8kLCrv rhwrakVJ9FrBRQCA== To: Thomas Huth , Paul Walmsley , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test In-Reply-To: <87frc9h0lo.fsf@yellow.woof> References: <20250513151631.3520793-1-namcao@linutronix.de> <16b74b63-f223-4f0b-b6e5-31cea5e620b4@redhat.com> <87frc9h0lo.fsf@yellow.woof> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:19:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87v7l17e8g.fsf@yellow.woof> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250929_031931_497468_C1F673BF X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.26 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Nam Cao writes: > Thomas Huth writes: >> Could you maybe change that into "__ASSEMBLER__" instead of "__ASSEMBLY__" ? >> I'm currently trying to get rid of the latter in the kernel sources, see: >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250606070952.498274-1-thuth@redhat.com/ > > It's been applied, it's up to riscv's maintainers how we should do this. > > I can send v3, or a follow-up patch. > > Or riscv maintainers can also squash that change into this patch, or > into your patch. > > I'm fine with any options. Riscv pull request is already created. A follow-up patch it is then. Nam _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv