From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8722C4167B for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:45:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mNG5pPKJSuQbf7CktvqsxsHlG5CdNfVCdX0THaPOyq8=; b=D2H6GpcExWQvTi 19LTRSHg0s0WbBWDe7gvop/eZJcw2DDbjIqgzh7qzF0foSPz8m02zuM1aTtn9dDR/SmQDarRdwrD1 LmHo03N9S38ZRSVDyA+u4sNTbbQMuecIYvTrKzoBzwODPcjQgrhPI8TTG2T1Wrlj7jIbj5FEb9G1R H81uwjinZUCDpR0YH7nzz9x6uYyDtDgwa2WSRzUHfsCTm7MskLjEIECOKMyktErZ6xseMy/SANlnl GBlWu3KOw2YtEblWCVGcfGZiZa6zJgstEEXiIkQhLE4k1weeb0r5wHu9+4vZ+XfENm2YyWLfgCdBp oit+3HTKWPVQg6KQj/Yg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r911F-00DFLr-12; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 10:45:13 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r911C-00DFJu-1e; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 10:45:11 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1701427507; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qEECtfSCuNJnYbbSSxaa7Yhx563AZhnbYIPY9oqxOFE=; b=T3NEQtyO3UjVNcOPdRfDLPqBbceTA/S3RG5pLrN/U1R54Q2+LC7E1qyZMq6Qdr2Lwq04Q7 o3RbMWPKuiDtnTWhcOihAwr10MgQL4MPJzwPuXjSE8T6gp+VGjfk6u/Ymyla3VOKfAsmmc Ccc1ZPp7aRV0WvqXtoVD6atSILRTlOYC+gmZcP1quvkiE5ooEnP1dGy3CQhMQmnhHkyoNi fjrSBFLZgwtCeutL0TuwQN8B6ZHMA2t6ITEqL89vyADio0MnrI5DVfPUnv3HUa3tTRDL7e +EhhGYzs843vvIZov1ZEMz4EArysm5xib9rklBXUl6z6IburTOa1nE4pPpkQBA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1701427507; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qEECtfSCuNJnYbbSSxaa7Yhx563AZhnbYIPY9oqxOFE=; b=5ivKSLWokv5u4EWLeFetTD8/zTFsnE28leOpFAM1uIFAuW0E1rMX60gedKhj/gj0RQebhI nzpCyFo1nVj5NNDA== To: Russell King , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , jianyong.wu@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, James Morse , Sudeep Holla , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late CPUs In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:45:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87v89ixkul.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231201_024510_692468_ED54E71E X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.98 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 21 2023 at 13:43, Russell King wrote: > --- > If the offline CPUs thing is a problem for the tools that consume > this value, we'd need to move cpu_capacity to be part of cpu.c's > common_cpu_attr_groups. However, attempts to discuss this just end > up in a black hole, so this is a non-starter. Thus, if this needs > to be done, it can be done as a separate patch. Offline CPUs have 0 capacity by definition.... _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv