public inbox for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] cacheinfo: Add helper to access any cache index for a given CPU
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 10:44:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a70f2b2-e45c-b125-1c14-d5a06097be58@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220525081416.3306043-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Hi Sudeep,

On 5/25/22 4:14 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> The cacheinfo for a given CPU at a given index is used at quite a few
> places by fetching the base point for index 0 using the helper
> per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) and offseting it by the required index.
> 
> Instead, add another helper to fetch the required pointer directly and
> use it to simplify and improve readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>   drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 14 +++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 

s/offseting/offsetting

It looks good to me with below nits fixed:

Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>


> diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> index b0bde272e2ae..c4547d8ac6f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_cacheinfo, ci_cpu_cacheinfo);
>   #define ci_cacheinfo(cpu)	(&per_cpu(ci_cpu_cacheinfo, cpu))
>   #define cache_leaves(cpu)	(ci_cacheinfo(cpu)->num_leaves)
>   #define per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu)	(ci_cacheinfo(cpu)->info_list)
> +#define per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu, idx)		\
> +				(per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) + (idx))
>   
>   struct cpu_cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
> @@ -172,7 +174,7 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu)
>   	}
>   
>   	while (index < cache_leaves(cpu)) {
> -		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> +		this_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu, index);
>   		if (this_leaf->level != 1)
>   			np = of_find_next_cache_node(np);
>   		else
> @@ -231,7 +233,7 @@ static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu)
>   	for (index = 0; index < cache_leaves(cpu); index++) {
>   		unsigned int i;
>   
> -		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> +		this_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu, index);
>   		/* skip if shared_cpu_map is already populated */
>   		if (!cpumask_empty(&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map))
>   			continue;
> @@ -242,7 +244,7 @@ static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu)
>   
>   			if (i == cpu || !sib_cpu_ci->info_list)
>   				continue;/* skip if itself or no cacheinfo */
> -			sib_leaf = sib_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> +			sib_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(i, index);
>   			if (cache_leaves_are_shared(this_leaf, sib_leaf)) {
>   				cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &sib_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
>   				cpumask_set_cpu(i, &this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
> @@ -258,12 +260,11 @@ static int cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu)
>   
>   static void cache_shared_cpu_map_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
> -	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
>   	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, *sib_leaf;
>   	unsigned int sibling, index;
>   
>   	for (index = 0; index < cache_leaves(cpu); index++) {
> -		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> +		this_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu, index);
>   		for_each_cpu(sibling, &this_leaf->shared_cpu_map) {
>   			struct cpu_cacheinfo *sib_cpu_ci;
> 

In cache_shared_cpu_map_remove(), the newly introduced macro
can be applied when the sibling CPU's cache info is fetched.

     sib_leaf = sib_cpu_ci->info_list + index;

     to

     sib_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(sibling, index);

   
> @@ -609,7 +610,6 @@ static int cache_add_dev(unsigned int cpu)
>   	int rc;
>   	struct device *ci_dev, *parent;
>   	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
> -	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
>   	const struct attribute_group **cache_groups;
>   
>   	rc = cpu_cache_sysfs_init(cpu);
> @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static int cache_add_dev(unsigned int cpu)
>   
>   	parent = per_cpu_cache_dev(cpu);
>   	for (i = 0; i < cache_leaves(cpu); i++) {
> -		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + i;
> +		this_leaf = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu, i);
>   		if (this_leaf->disable_sysfs)
>   			continue;
>   		if (this_leaf->type == CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE)
> 

Thanks,
Gavin


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-01  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-25  8:14 [PATCH v3 00/16] arch_topology: Updates to add socket support and fix cluster ids Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] cacheinfo: Use of_cpu_device_node_get instead cpu_dev->of_node Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14   ` [PATCH v3 02/16] cacheinfo: Add helper to access any cache index for a given CPU Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14     ` [PATCH v3 03/16] cacheinfo: Move cache_leaves_are_shared out of CONFIG_OF Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14       ` [PATCH v3 04/16] cacheinfo: Add support to check if last level cache(LLC) is valid or shared Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14         ` [PATCH v3 05/16] cacheinfo: Allow early detection and population of cache attributes Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14           ` [PATCH v3 06/16] arch_topology: Add support to parse and detect " Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14             ` [PATCH v3 07/16] arch_topology: Use the last level cache information from the cacheinfo Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14               ` [PATCH v3 08/16] arm64: topology: Remove redundant setting of llc_id in CPU topology Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14                 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] arch_topology: Drop LLC identifier stash from the " Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14                   ` [PATCH v3 10/16] arch_topology: Set thread sibling cpumask only within the cluster Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14                     ` [PATCH v3 11/16] arch_topology: Check for non-negative value rather than -1 for IDs validity Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14                       ` [PATCH v3 12/16] arch_topology: Avoid parsing through all the CPUs once a outlier CPU is found Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14                         ` [PATCH v3 13/16] arch_topology: Don't set cluster identifier as physical package identifier Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14                           ` [PATCH v3 14/16] arch_topology: Drop unnecessary check for uninitialised package_id Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14                             ` [PATCH v3 15/16] arch_topology: Set cluster identifier in each core/thread from /cpu-map Sudeep Holla
2022-05-25  8:14                               ` [PATCH v3 16/16] arch_topology: Add support for parsing sockets in /cpu-map Sudeep Holla
2022-06-03 12:30                               ` [PATCH v3 15/16] arch_topology: Set cluster identifier in each core/thread from /cpu-map Dietmar Eggemann
2022-06-06 10:21                                 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-10 10:08                                   ` Vincent Guittot
2022-06-10 10:27                                     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-13  9:19                                       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-06-13 11:17                                         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-16 16:02                                           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-06-17 11:16                                             ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-20 13:27                                               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-06-21 16:00                                                 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-14 17:59                                       ` Vincent Guittot
2022-06-15 17:00                                         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-15 22:44                                           ` Vincent Guittot
2022-06-15 22:45                                           ` Vincent Guittot
2022-06-01  3:40                         ` [PATCH v3 12/16] arch_topology: Avoid parsing through all the CPUs once a outlier CPU is found Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  3:38                       ` [PATCH v3 11/16] arch_topology: Check for non-negative value rather than -1 for IDs validity Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  3:36                     ` [PATCH v3 10/16] arch_topology: Set thread sibling cpumask only within the cluster Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  3:35                   ` [PATCH v3 09/16] arch_topology: Drop LLC identifier stash from the CPU topology Gavin Shan
2022-06-01 12:06                     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-02  6:44                       ` Gavin Shan
2022-06-02  6:42                   ` Gavin Shan
2022-06-02  6:42                 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] arm64: topology: Remove redundant setting of llc_id in " Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  3:31               ` [PATCH v3 07/16] arch_topology: Use the last level cache information from the cacheinfo Gavin Shan
2022-06-02 14:26               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-06-06  9:54                 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-01  3:29             ` [PATCH v3 06/16] arch_topology: Add support to parse and detect cache attributes Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  3:25           ` [PATCH v3 05/16] cacheinfo: Allow early detection and population of " Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  3:20         ` [PATCH v3 04/16] cacheinfo: Add support to check if last level cache(LLC) is valid or shared Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  2:51       ` [PATCH v3 03/16] cacheinfo: Move cache_leaves_are_shared out of CONFIG_OF Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  2:44     ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2022-06-01 12:45       ` [PATCH v3 02/16] cacheinfo: Add helper to access any cache index for a given CPU Sudeep Holla
2022-06-01  2:45   ` [PATCH v3 01/16] cacheinfo: Use of_cpu_device_node_get instead cpu_dev->of_node Gavin Shan
2022-06-01  3:49 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] arch_topology: Updates to add socket support and fix cluster ids Gavin Shan
2022-06-01 12:03   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a70f2b2-e45c-b125-1c14-d5a06097be58@redhat.com \
    --to=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangqing@vivo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox