public inbox for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, alex@ghiti.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] riscv: traps: make insn fetch common in unknown instruction
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 09:31:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b7165eb-43fc-40ab-80cd-dda61e2f933d@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45408e3d-5b7a-40cc-bfca-b58cf3737c9c@codethink.co.uk>

On 13/11/2024 09:21, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 13/11/2024 09:17, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> Add the trapped instruction (insn) as the second argument to
>> riscv_v_first_use_handler() from the trap handler so when we
>> add more handlers we can do the fetch of the instruction just
>> once.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
>> ---
>> - fixed wording of patch from rfc
>> ---
>>   arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h |  4 ++--
>>   arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c       | 11 ++++++++++-
>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c      | 11 +----------
>>   3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ 
>> vector.h
>> index be7d309cca8a..c9f0b02cd975 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h
>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>>   extern unsigned long riscv_v_vsize;
>>   int riscv_v_setup_vsize(void);
>> -bool riscv_v_first_use_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> +bool riscv_v_first_use_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 insn);
>>   void kernel_vector_begin(void);
>>   void kernel_vector_end(void);
>>   void get_cpu_vector_context(void);
>> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ struct pt_regs;
>>   static inline int riscv_v_setup_vsize(void) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
>>   static __always_inline bool has_vector(void) { return false; }
>> -static inline bool riscv_v_first_use_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) 
>> { return false; }
>> +static inline bool riscv_v_first_use_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, 
>> u32 insn) { return false; }
>>   static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_query(struct pt_regs *regs) 
>> { return false; }
>>   static inline bool riscv_v_vstate_ctrl_user_allowed(void) { return 
>> false; }
>>   #define riscv_v_vsize (0)
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> index 51ebfd23e007..1c3fab272fd1 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -172,11 +172,20 @@ asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void 
>> do_trap_insn_illegal(struct pt_regs *re
>>       bool handled;
>>       if (user_mode(regs)) {
>> +        u32 __user *epc = (u32 __user *)regs->epc;
>> +        u32 insn = (u32)regs->badaddr;
>> +
>>           irqentry_enter_from_user_mode(regs);
>>           local_irq_enable();
>> -        handled = riscv_v_first_use_handler(regs);
>> +        if (!insn) {
>> +            if (__get_user(insn, epc)) {
>> +                /* todo */
>> +            }
> 
> grr, of course as soon as it is sent I notice the /todo/ here
> 
> Not sure if we should print something if __get_user() fails for
> what /should/ be an good instruction addrss.... should probably
> at-least bail out of do_trap_insn_illegal() if not also print a
> warning.
>

i think doing:

	if (___get_user(insn, epr)) {
		handled = false;
		insn = 0;
	}

then just checking for "if (insn)" before hand handlers.

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-13  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-13  9:17 updates for instruction trapping and ptrace Ben Dooks
2024-11-13  9:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] riscv: ptrace: add regs_set_register() Ben Dooks
2024-11-13 10:12   ` Andrew Jones
2024-11-13 10:19     ` Ben Dooks
2024-11-13  9:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] riscv: traps: make insn fetch common in unknown instruction Ben Dooks
2024-11-13  9:21   ` Ben Dooks
2024-11-13  9:31     ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2024-11-13  9:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] riscv: insn: add RV_EXTRACT_FUNCT3() Ben Dooks
2024-11-13 10:17   ` Andrew Jones
2024-11-13 10:35     ` Ben Dooks
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-17 13:08 RFC: extern illegal instruction trap and trap RDCYCLE Ben Dooks
2024-09-17 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] riscv: traps: make insn fetch common in unknown instruction Ben Dooks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9b7165eb-43fc-40ab-80cd-dda61e2f933d@codethink.co.uk \
    --to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox