From: "Troy Mitchell" <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
To: "Junzhong Pan" <panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>,
"Thinh Nguyen" <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <spacemit@lists.linux.dev>,
"Troy Mitchell" <troy.mitchell@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: resume xHCI child on runtime resume in host mode
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 22:16:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DL9ZZ8F7HTZT.1IUMD1ECSOZXL@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908-resume-xhci-v1-1-aca107602e9c@linux.spacemit.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4032 bytes --]
On Tue Sep 8, 2026 at 10:01 PM +08, Junzhong Pan wrote:
> USB controller runtime suspend halts the controller on disconnection.
> It relies on platforms with custom connection notification to start
> the controller again.
>
> The host branch of dwc3_runtime_resume() does nothing currently. There
> are two paths that can trigger a runtime resume of the dwc3 core in
> host mode:
>
> (a) Wake lands on the xHCI child (DT platforms, e.g. Qualcomm, i.MX8MP)
> A platform wakeup IRQ fires and the glue handler calls
> pm_runtime_resume(&xhci->dev). Runtime PM walks upward, resumes
> the dwc3 parent first, then resumes xHCI. Both wake correctly.
>
> (b) Wake lands on the dwc3 parent (ACPI platforms)
> When an ACPI Notify(ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE) targets the dwc3
> parent device -- for example via a Generic Event Device on a
> hardware-reduced platform where dwc3 is enumerated as an ACPI
> device without a glue driver -- the ACPI core turns this into
> pm_request_resume(dwc3_dev). Runtime PM does not propagate resume
> downward, so the xHCI child stays suspended. Root hub polling is
> never re-armed, and a device plugged in while suspended is silently
> dropped.
>
> This patch fills in the host branch to cover case (b) by requesting an
> async resume of the xHCI child so xhci_resume() can restore the port
> state machine and re-arm root hub polling. Glue drivers in case (a)
> resume xHCI directly, an extra call introduced by this change, but
> runtime PM can serialize those requests and skip device already active,
> so the extra resume call is safe. Those calls can be replaced with
> resume calls to dwc3 device later.
>
> Tested on SpacemiT K3 Pico-ITX, covering both wakeup paths: an ACPI
> boot with a GED device notifying the dwc3 node (HID 808622B7), and a
> DT boot with a modified dwc3-generic-plat driver exposing a wakeup IRQ
> similar to dwc3-qcom.c and dwc3-imx8mp.c. This is not validation on
> actual Qualcomm or i.MX8MP hardware, changing those drivers would still
> need platform-specific testing.
>
> Acked-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
> Assisted-by: Opencode:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Junzhong Pan <panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
> - add Assisted-By tag and collect tag
> - refine the commit message and comments as suggested
>
> Link to RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20260811090817.109350-1-panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com/
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index fd5c2cd36c59..76883dc6184c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -2739,6 +2739,18 @@ int dwc3_runtime_resume(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> }
> break;
> case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST:
> + /*
> + * Only the xHCI child's resume re-arms root hub polling, which
> + * is what rediscovers a device plugged in while suspended.
> + * Runtime PM doesn't resume children, so request it here.
> + * Keep it asynchronous to avoid waiting for the parent's resume
> + * callback to finish from inside it. Glue drivers may also
> + * resume xHCI directly, but runtime PM will serialize those
> + * requests and skips an already-active device.
> + */
> + if (dwc->xhci)
> + pm_request_resume(&dwc->xhci->dev);
> + break;
Could we also check a parent-only resume with no USB wake event? For
example, reading the DWC3 debugfs lsp_dump file calls
pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dwc->dev). With both devices suspended, this
change would wake xHCI too.
Would both devices return to autosuspend after the read and still
detect a subsequent plug-in? This would help cover the non-wakeup
case.
> default:
> /* do nothing */
> break;
>
> ---
> base-commit: cee9395acd8043be0644b25c34bfa86623f2b935
> change-id: 20260908-resume-xhci-0fa34ff9b332
>
> Best regards,
--
Troy Mitchell
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 14:01 [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: resume xHCI child on runtime resume in host mode Junzhong Pan
2026-09-08 14:16 ` Troy Mitchell [this message]
2026-09-09 12:28 ` Junzhong Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DL9ZZ8F7HTZT.1IUMD1ECSOZXL@linux.dev \
--to=troy.mitchell@linux.dev \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=panjunzhong@linux.spacemit.com \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox