Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] pwm: sophgo: add driver for Sophgo SG2042 PWM

[Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>]

On 2025/2/5 18:06, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Chen,
>
> I was tempted to apply this patch while reading throug it until nearly
> the end ...
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 03:01:13PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>> [...]
>> +static int pwm_sg2042_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> [...]
>> +	rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared_deasserted(dev, NULL);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(rst))
>> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rst), "Failed to get reset\n");
>> +
>> +	chip->ops = &pwm_sg2042_ops;
>> +	chip->atomic = true;
>> +
>> +	ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
>> +	if (ret < 0) {
>> +		reset_control_assert(rst);
> This is wrong (well, or unneeded). With
> devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared_deasserted() the devm cleanup
> cares for reasserting the reset.
>
>> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register PWM chip\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> If you want I can apply and squash the following in:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
> index ce8cf8af3402..ff4639d849ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
> @@ -174,10 +174,8 @@ static int pwm_sg2042_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	chip->atomic = true;
>   
>   	ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		reset_control_assert(rst);
> +	if (ret < 0)
>   		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register PWM chip\n");
> -	}
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> ack?
>
> Best regards
> Uwe

Ack.

Thanks,

Chen



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv