From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F69C4332F for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:15:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=3k3MTzAtUtcoAXnIDPFuapExWJToDyeWUdL4aFTm7CQ=; b=gBUyXL1A0Mh6ti lsRl+mMusC0H1trHzSGLEDo+VpwMwDlEATDDTjO04fp98r5RbaXvdHVlaX51nO5q3V9tnHHNLpwbP fCshOcYgMxLbPJqfUsks30k93aCfAzlWQgCPiVtrr7bfzQEWt2NOa6QN+Z8KGmJbez/MHslptwr2b 3QQ4X3bRec74eUv6Tc42990XHm4mjuwpOgMdpVH3adJzvKFuC2bI+2wy9pUBv7kTB782JFhaiuzvq UlHK6OJR8i50/iicjyRlvqnFfAfQvQO9beaetKUZuRQlNqtrNWr2zV1tf9KdwaV5IMBxSMxzzr7KK 4m9KmhEBKwKTAkDd2SRA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ol8ur-0025cv-ET; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:15:25 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ol8un-0025bQ-DF for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:15:24 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B35A160A65; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53E72C433C1; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:15:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1666185320; bh=0fDDAoi3dnUHQ1foQefkNNsCHxziAopP6QZW/HTWMIo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bOnqz9/OkAcC0mOgARn2gnHWPxCSJ3Cg0nOe9Tvy/+h6O2BTS4Pftjf01NjCg5iLh CN3jEst+AEtCiIT0n8iYJVJkfDlhKxkheyzUhUYZMuXOAhD2syFunfe591vNUoPTxM zSnCBKjBNERO6iOf+FMyzb5LtmIkeQ1mkK2R/1w1wMv+cvLTj2KNzrohZhuC2nc14t FVnGSyz5Sx0HixAyj5846+dtTnjyKOxCJnTwJKq6pk3PcuLGXiIG6t21kdiCPHvm0+ DvLvKCERm0V8qTtqsYfcrUiYnWrsmMmvznD+olgLGSgwh5cKyJ5k9nZuLGfTmhCKv6 z/42mwYISGoRw== Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:05:42 +0800 From: Jisheng Zhang To: Guo Ren Cc: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] riscv: fix race when vmap stack overflow and remove shadow_stack Message-ID: References: <20220928162007.3791-1-jszhang@kernel.org> <20220928162007.3791-4-jszhang@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221019_061521_578744_6B9F8A4E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 36.70 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:52:16AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:54 PM Guo Ren wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:03 AM Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:20:06AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > > Currently, when detecting vmap stack overflow, riscv firstly switches > > > > to the so called shadow stack, then use this shadow stack to call the > > > > get_overflow_stack() to get the overflow stack. However, there's > > > > a race here if two or more harts use the same shadow stack at the same > > > > time. > > > > > > > > To solve this race, we rely on two facts: > > > > 1. the content of kernel thread pointer I.E "tp" register can still > > > > be gotten from the the CSR_SCRATCH register, thus we can clobber tp > > > > under the condtion that we restore tp from CSR_SCRATCH later. > > > > > > > > 2. Once vmap stack overflow happen, panic is comming soon, no > > > > performance concern at all, so we don't need to define the overflow > > > > stack as percpu var, we can simplify it into a pointer array which > > > > points to allocated pages. > > > > > > > > Thus we can use tp as a tmp register to get the cpu id to calculate > > > > the offset of overflow stack pointer array for each cpu w/o shadow > > > > stack any more. Thus the race condition is removed as a side effect. > > > > > > > > NOTE: we can use similar mechanism to let each cpu use different shadow > > > > stack to fix the race codition, but if we can remove shadow stack usage > > > > totally, why not. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > > > Fixes: 31da94c25aea ("riscv: add VMAP_STACK overflow detection") > > > > --- > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 1 - > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 4 +- > > > > arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 + > > > > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 56 ++++--------------------- > > > > arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 31 ++++++++------ > > > > 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h > > > > index ef386fcf3939..4a06fa0f6493 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h > > > > @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_s); > > > > DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_m); > > > > DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_break); > > > > > > > > -asmlinkage unsigned long get_overflow_stack(void); > > > > asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs); > > > > > > > > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_PROTOTYPES_H */ > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > > > index c970d41dc4c6..c604a5212a73 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > > > @@ -28,14 +28,12 @@ > > > > > > > > #define THREAD_SHIFT (PAGE_SHIFT + THREAD_SIZE_ORDER) > > > > #define OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE SZ_4K > > > > -#define SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE (1024) > > > > +#define OVERFLOW_STACK_SHIFT 12 > > > > > > oops, this should be removed, will update it in a newer version after > > > collecting review comments. > > > > > > > > > > > #define IRQ_STACK_SIZE THREAD_SIZE > > > > > > > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > > > > > > > -extern long shadow_stack[SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE / sizeof(long)]; > > > > - > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c > > > > index df9444397908..62bf3bacc322 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c > > > > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ void asm_offsets(void) > > > > OFFSET(TASK_TI_PREEMPT_COUNT, task_struct, thread_info.preempt_count); > > > > OFFSET(TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP, task_struct, thread_info.kernel_sp); > > > > OFFSET(TASK_TI_USER_SP, task_struct, thread_info.user_sp); > > > > + OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU, task_struct, thread_info.cpu); > > > > > > > > OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F0, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[0]); > > > > OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F1, task_struct, thread.fstate.f[1]); > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > > > index a3e1ed2fa2ac..5a6171a90d81 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > > > @@ -223,54 +223,16 @@ END(ret_from_exception) > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK > > > > ENTRY(handle_kernel_stack_overflow) > > > > - la sp, shadow_stack > > > > - addi sp, sp, SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE > > > > - > > > > - //save caller register to shadow stack > > > > - addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK) > > > > - REG_S x1, PT_RA(sp) > > > > - REG_S x5, PT_T0(sp) > > > > - REG_S x6, PT_T1(sp) > > > > - REG_S x7, PT_T2(sp) > > > > - REG_S x10, PT_A0(sp) > > > > - REG_S x11, PT_A1(sp) > > > > - REG_S x12, PT_A2(sp) > > > > - REG_S x13, PT_A3(sp) > > > > - REG_S x14, PT_A4(sp) > > > > - REG_S x15, PT_A5(sp) > > > > - REG_S x16, PT_A6(sp) > > > > - REG_S x17, PT_A7(sp) > > > > - REG_S x28, PT_T3(sp) > > > > - REG_S x29, PT_T4(sp) > > > > - REG_S x30, PT_T5(sp) > > > > - REG_S x31, PT_T6(sp) > > > > - > > > > - la ra, restore_caller_reg > > > > - tail get_overflow_stack > > > > - > > > > -restore_caller_reg: > > > > - //save per-cpu overflow stack > > > > - REG_S a0, -8(sp) > > > > - //restore caller register from shadow_stack > > > > - REG_L x1, PT_RA(sp) > > > > - REG_L x5, PT_T0(sp) > > > > - REG_L x6, PT_T1(sp) > > > > - REG_L x7, PT_T2(sp) > > > > - REG_L x10, PT_A0(sp) > > > > - REG_L x11, PT_A1(sp) > > > > - REG_L x12, PT_A2(sp) > > > > - REG_L x13, PT_A3(sp) > > > > - REG_L x14, PT_A4(sp) > > > > - REG_L x15, PT_A5(sp) > > > > - REG_L x16, PT_A6(sp) > > > > - REG_L x17, PT_A7(sp) > > > > - REG_L x28, PT_T3(sp) > > > > - REG_L x29, PT_T4(sp) > > > > - REG_L x30, PT_T5(sp) > > > > - REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp) > > > > + la sp, overflow_stack > > > > + /* use tp as tmp register since we can restore it from CSR_SCRATCH */ > > > > + REG_L tp, TASK_TI_CPU(tp) > > > > + slli tp, tp, RISCV_LGPTR > > > > + add tp, sp, tp > > > > + REG_L sp, 0(tp) > > > > + > > > > + /* restore tp */ > > > > + csrr tp, CSR_SCRATCH > > > > > > > > - //load per-cpu overflow stack > > > > - REG_L sp, -8(sp) > > > > addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK) > > > > > > > > //save context to overflow stack > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > > > > index 73f06cd149d9..b6c64f0fb70f 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > > > > @@ -216,23 +216,12 @@ int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long pc) > > > > #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */ > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK > > > > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], > > > > - overflow_stack)__aligned(16); > > > > -/* > > > > - * shadow stack, handled_ kernel_ stack_ overflow(in kernel/entry.S) is used > > > > - * to get per-cpu overflow stack(get_overflow_stack). > > > > - */ > > > > -long shadow_stack[SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)]; > > > > -asmlinkage unsigned long get_overflow_stack(void) > > > > -{ > > > > - return (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack) + > > > > - OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE; > > > > -} > > > > +void *overflow_stack[NR_CPUS] __ro_after_init __aligned(16); > > Er... We've talked NR_CPUS = 8192, even a pointer would cause 64KB wasted. > > > > I prefer the previous solution with a atomic flag. > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > index 5cbd6684ef52..42a3b14a20ab 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > @@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ END(ret_from_exception) > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK > > ENTRY(handle_kernel_stack_overflow) > > +1: la sp, spin_ shadow_stack > > + amoswap.w sp, sp, (sp) > > + bnez sp, 1b > > la sp, shadow_stack > > addi sp, sp, SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > > index 73f06cd149d9..9058a05cac53 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > > @@ -229,11 +229,15 @@ asmlinkage unsigned long get_overflow_stack(void) > > OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE; > > } > > > > +atomic_t spin_ shadow_stack __section(".sdata"); > > + > > asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs) > > { > > unsigned long tsk_stk = (unsigned long)current->stack; > > unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack); > > > > + atomic_set_release(spin_ shadow_stack, 0); > > + > > console_verbose(); > > > > pr_emerg("Insufficient stack space to handle exception!\n"); > Hi Jisheng, Hi Guo, > > Could you give out a new patch based on the above style to fix the > problem first? It's a minor modification and consolidate the entry.S > procedure. > I read the above msg as: A new patch following the above style to fix the race condition. Then another patch to remove the shadow stack usage. Will cook the fix patch soon. Thanks _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv