From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F4D2C4332F for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:04:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RFX6ucM4FQjvsJdcPOMyTCZXM/Ifb/cH7DjAdEn924g=; b=I+vLLdNXCon5uu IIDrv29uhwO8Xq74GNpNV8KfCTK8F7no28tfuVuPi7j8t6off+09/Pjwbom49KS3Rw6RvBsDojaZK EZchzOwdVISkJ9JESwX8IemcQd9c4ByaJriErVI31eL1puw5EpOKGBMzWexhzzFBhHYpmEzSpYBnX 7yKxFBAqGWRgKaQqI0OQHGmdLsO2ROemcr6WsMqlSPWGqUo1P3+IdjtkSrC/Hio/HQ2RVVYpEPcSg 3XZbaq2xjB+3H+YtDxJR9ikQh4Jp7gHyj4g0AMoae4p5ed3ESs+nOvupQ4ywKUT0ZOitIMZhCQeFo gdOV7S5878eSBB+6FQXQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1okSar-00DeM9-6R; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:03:57 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1okSao-00DeLC-QG for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:03:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7129611A3; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2635C433D6; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:03:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1666022633; bh=DLnN0htvivwVhuJQm7cIim+/YRJwPriv2PpoqwyHlSE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QiuJUAR/ea4x4NaK2D4yJyt1vA6WE758Mv0xHXmgJ9aNw3zYyfmyCCyey7ihQq02E 2RwieJBrEp7hJSUKL/h/IcdWi9VHL0oDunl6+G1czR3ZWGU4//3Z9uY6PadeQKK/zW 1MyDEBUM2RJTiV1qzheh2YXAkf92LBGAcM8WjDNqOjfww41HyoYTf6PhG5x8dG55Ya PLSL9qY4Gyx4kVKY/s2AghpR4a/tG7VRxcGh63KoQJ+UmcXgqjwi9WFm3BCdVTwkhW mLdyXZ1lK97qfyWgRU7CPwxo3iGpKiCWlGthjkjbXnL1/O+MXZLHK9E1x3GvSQK/1/ Opg8ZlbD22QNA== Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:03:48 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Andrew Jones Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , Conor Dooley , Dao Lu , Heiko Stuebner , Guo Ren , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] (attempt to) Fix RISC-V toolchain extension support detection Message-ID: References: <20221006173520.1785507-1-conor@kernel.org> <20221017155103.4dt5uzmnlbtibqcn@kamzik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221017155103.4dt5uzmnlbtibqcn@kamzik> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221017_090354_906009_BC91086D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:51:03PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:35:19PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > However, we could also drop the compiler and linker checking if we > converted our use of cbo.* to the insn-def.h framework (I think Heiko once > mentioned looking at doing that, but I'm not sure.) I'm looking at adding > Zicboz support right now and for starters I've duplicated and modified > these checks. But, I think I'll look into defining the instruction type > needed for cbo.* and using insn-def instead. What is the ETA of your zicboz support? Do you think these patches should be applied to v6.1 & backported before being replaced by insn-def when your zicboz support arrives? Or just wait for your zicboz series? Trying to decide what status I should set for this in patchwork. Thanks, Conor. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv