From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8B04C433FE for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:40:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wmlKoIvPRE5DbA+/4MWF2cd6Nkg0xfzGVj+DEPRaDbI=; b=PH56+69erJZqIZ xhSBxdIHcPC2adxgWS0ygY8C5qE93RDBUdadKLB5A/W53VBs+qp2+an3owExQs6WYV1LaSUn9y6qX JSq+CfSEF6ZC5QD3cL2agdvO6MG6vYU+agty11jbRdERVz0C91GwL4A5BoMoS3UfMHm4U5BqZjG37 LPTnQcCdItdvzA8gHZVtOXwz32OH3irhNR/BZro1Q6f+E3nERhZ53z9mZErRjnUgTqHQipXjCAXEl ilhsM4s1shrbDpRiwk50f5YcGr2P+ByiOZsVwxJ09ZxdSiUkVeP5bN7QYKciAD1FeVNRzGQ2qXXg3 5PxFmmIITJXlAkCmVP+A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oiwZS-00BZXm-Qa; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:40:14 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oiwZP-00BZWa-QW for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:40:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1665661212; x=1697197212; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=qwBNvrTGhKx7haBmbfNDVoNRn8CE3KTouJoIXdepuVk=; b=Xiwx/LN8VpHzoQF62My05RtBrY7g4Ql5DRwSRErytDj7zlHyeZD7vTSo CSocimqtK/MMryqNRcz1fFQ3zfFoLc8QoY4VQR9FyV8YXGtw3APH5Q43h q7gj1wC1xiXYQALfD7zl6mbsGFhZVFklxHzH6zEo/T2tCLuC6vlruc9/p zzH1t63wEka8bxbUNKu2VLHnr8lvD9qgefsJr7p6ew5IJwZWxjBAq1T+P Ql5rDCHSuvxHclMQYMrUgvSBNXjGzxmvxFFwlPyMI7qoeAcKgTtDZEu+j CfiqtnpTHTb5C1LeOjjq2qoYpgKyAy+cNYAVN+/TG496WulqbTTC5vsCe A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,180,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="178539448" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 13 Oct 2022 04:40:05 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 04:40:03 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 04:40:02 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:39:39 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Palmer Dabbelt CC: Conor Dooley , Atish Patra , , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Documentation: RISC-V: patch-acceptance: s/implementor/implementer Message-ID: References: <20221013045619.18906-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> <20221013045619.18906-5-palmer@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221013045619.18906-5-palmer@rivosinc.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221013_044011_944663_90EE4D14 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.39 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:56:19PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > From: Palmer Dabbelt > > Implementor does appear to be a word, but it's not very common. > > Suggested-by: Conor Dooley The overlords would probably rather this email got the credit but doesn't really matter for S-b tags. Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt > --- > Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > index 9fed6b318b49..89c7d8abd4bb 100644 > --- a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > +++ b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ specifications from the RISC-V foundation this means "Frozen" or > ECR. (Developers may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees > that contain code for any draft extensions that they wish.) > > -Additionally, the RISC-V specification allows implementors to create > +Additionally, the RISC-V specification allows implementers to create > their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required > to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V > Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential > @@ -38,5 +38,5 @@ RISC-V extensions, we'll only accept patches for extensions that either: > for which a timeline for availability has been made public. > > Hardware that does not meet its published timelines may have support > -removed. (Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel > +removed. (Implementers, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel > trees containing code for any custom extensions that they wish.) > -- > 2.38.0 > _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv