From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: <kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
<anup@brainfault.org>, <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
<vernon2gm@gmail.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: KVM: Fix compilation without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 15:21:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0ge0mbur3HAJFdJ@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221013134217.1850349-1-ajones@ventanamicro.com>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:42:17PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> RISC-V: KVM: Fix compilation without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
nit: I know that this is what it fixes, but I think the commit subject
is a little misleading when it doesnt touch arch/riscv/kvm & has some
meaning for non-kvm too.
> riscv_cbom_block_size and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always
> be available and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always be invoked
Yup, I like where this is going...
> even when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM enabled. This
> is because disabling RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM means "don't use zicbom
> instructions in the kernel" not "pretend there isn't zicbom, even
> when there is". When zicbom is available, whether the kernel enables
> its use with RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM or not, KVM will offer it to guests.
...right, I'll take your word for this part. You're the kvm people :)
> Ensure we can build KVM and that the block size is initialized even
> when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM.
>
> Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Is cacheflush.c the "right" place for it? idk. But shaving that yak is a
waste of time imo. I like the unconditional availability & if ZICBOM is
off in the kernel I figure it should not matter that we set the
blocksize.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 8 ------
> arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 41 -----------------------------
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> index 273ece6b622f..1470e556cdb1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> @@ -42,16 +42,8 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> -/*
> - * The T-Head CMO errata internally probe the CBOM block size, but otherwise
> - * don't depend on Zicbom.
> - */
> extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void);
> -#else
> -static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
> -#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
> void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> index 6cb7d96ad9c7..8525f4a2d598 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
> */
>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -86,3 +87,40 @@ void flush_icache_pte(pte_t pte)
> flush_icache_all();
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> +
> +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
> +
> +void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node;
> + unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> + u32 val, probed_block_size;
> + int ret;
> +
> + probed_block_size = 0;
> + for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> + unsigned long hartid;
> +
> + ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!probed_block_size) {
> + probed_block_size = val;
> + cbom_hartid = hartid;
> + } else {
> + if (probed_block_size != val)
> + pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> + cbom_hartid, hartid);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (probed_block_size)
> + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> index b0add983530a..d919efab6eba 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> @@ -8,13 +8,8 @@
> #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
> #include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> -unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
> -
> static bool noncoherent_supported;
>
> void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> @@ -77,42 +72,6 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> dev->dma_coherent = coherent;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> -void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> -{
> - struct device_node *node;
> - unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> - u32 val, probed_block_size;
> - int ret;
> -
> - probed_block_size = 0;
> - for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> - unsigned long hartid;
> -
> - ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> - if (ret)
> - continue;
> -
> - /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> - if (ret)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (!probed_block_size) {
> - probed_block_size = val;
> - cbom_hartid = hartid;
> - } else {
> - if (probed_block_size != val)
> - pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> - cbom_hartid, hartid);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (probed_block_size)
> - riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
> {
> WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
> --
> 2.37.3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-13 13:42 [PATCH v2] RISC-V: KVM: Fix compilation without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM Andrew Jones
2022-10-13 13:47 ` Anup Patel
2022-10-13 13:48 ` Andrew Jones
2022-10-13 14:21 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-10-13 14:39 ` Andrew Jones
2022-10-13 20:05 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0ge0mbur3HAJFdJ@wendy \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox