From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B54C4332F for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:29:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=DiorK8etSGKQQYw+XDrHGvliaaDT9yHxiWZfSIAfe4U=; b=YyFn+Fq2wfouzJ 1qjXMSUxi0EsZmoQGco9H7qzr2f5ifIErDHu009j20UR2pmDeDI8DQHvSstXF1BswcDt9w7aihGqp HOHkCGOGuvzRwevaW344udJ9iY7pQJNrwTgZZGHnIXthWvxFh1sjJwv4FsSCp9j2zK2dh76BBbUDh /0QFbkxhKjehljGEaue5miEhMCoWGMY8UaJk7aG28JKCMUi5pKR873eJmkqlzfzLIQENJx9ewdBWZ ZAHHWFBFtWssRAHX+ZQqIyPbGkrDyFHWnvQnvS0tNOCUUSGbT+2FxpFtvnv58Ump/lQraqcF3TO3V ynHnMF8KdGp+KmPk10oQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oj7e2-00DAI1-NO; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:29:42 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oj7dz-00DAHd-Vo for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:29:42 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 544AC61988; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E30A7C433C1; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:29:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1665703778; bh=q8EPhK4EjdWm2TJUs9B6vNjUDa5Uao/4HBV3tRnWlOc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XVoXTMGaaFUues++pM7kNpbCtTTsQg4GjrvKA57MSgQkdRtKo8edNdPHr4I0TNWwa jLmPcdNZASYA7BcUWBmnNFegObneiQBc2ggkmHtuabB8y/5+DaV01fUwivSD4W0Zuo lQaQSylNl+Orb79Hv/8MDuaoto3AcckiMLp2HyiZfs6nA8SKpDOlNVg/S4TirhEEyY 0rU04iSVshdgIJKJCDOiRo4WwRvpqqeL630pcWg14gKQXcSpBiP9STlv8+EMu7yCVE OV8U7UvuMOZAc0+JBD/kAzT1e5Nou1EOj9k3iOh2xuCG7eMwmHALL8jPujnjxZlGEh yMfor0xSvxsxA== Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:29:35 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley Subject: Re: RISC-V Patchwork Message-ID: References: <20221011160744.2167025-1-conor@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221013_162940_145254_65689FBF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 38.97 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 04:14:39PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:07:45 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote: > > Hey, > > > > As one or two people have already noticed, we've resurrected the > > patchwork for the RISC-V list @ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/ > > > > The patchwork bot should let people know when their patches have been > > applied. Hopefully it'll help people track what the status of their > > patches are a little better and try to prevent stuff falling through > > the cracks in Palmer's inbox. > > > > As an FYI, the statuses that are intended to be used are: > > - New: No action has been taken yet > > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others > > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested > > changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new > > version > > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available > > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree > > - Accepted: The patch has been applied > > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an > > email > > > > I reset patchwork and marked all patches as archived so we would have a > > fresh start. If your patch has been archived & not applied by the end of > > this merge window, feel free to resend it. > > > > Thanks, > > Conor. > > > > @Palmer: hopefully I did the scissors thing correctly.. > > b4 doesn't like it, but my old scripts just picked up the whole thing as a > patch. I tossed the above bits, LMK if something went off the rails. I just copied the suggested scissors format from the git-mailinfo man page and pasted that. I didn't know this prior to 5 mins ago, but `b4 mbox` splits it on the scissors line, into a patch and an email inside the mbox - but for w/e reason, `git am` (or `b4 shazam`) then seems to try and apply the email instead of the patch? Or else pasting the patch into mutt was a terrible idea? Maybe it's worth mentioning to Konstantin that things get messed up here, I'll do it tomorrow if I remember. Unlikely I'll ever really send many more patches with this format so w/e at the end of the day. Thanks, Conor. > > > > > -- >8 -- > > From f886e8a9def4bd3f2fa8a0a4d7e92c94fe72ea72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Conor Dooley > > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:49:53 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add RISC-V's patchwork > > > > The RISC-V patchwork instance on kernel.org has had some necromancy > > performed on it & will be used going forward. The statuses that are > > intended to be used are: > > - New: No action has been taken yet > > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others > > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested > > changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new > > version > > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available > > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree > > - Accepted: The patch has been applied > > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an > > email > > > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 8a5012ba6ff9..e2882dc703d8 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -17516,6 +17516,7 @@ M: Palmer Dabbelt > > M: Albert Ou > > L: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > > S: Supported > > +Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/ > > P: Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git > > F: arch/riscv/ > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv > _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv