From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF07AC433FE for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 07:13:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=42r0ktLouC/mRWxZz++xPYMjiAYdi7XRFYWYjQHk6FQ=; b=itylBxjeuVpnDE EbyutzXP/AuXuGDKF9NTC/1H31Phly+RLFaKGNGkkVJlStJNf9ypDaxYokCa9ZBA22NcuWL3/sdWO bASEKjMYdNWXU3AB/MPz3x7+TCKMyNhdiZv1Tz3Mi8baOz37q426RaxtT8MjQaoG4HBHlIW0GxzaN j4+YShMdkPwdWfw2Fb/0+KjMeU+0dElmSxcmAhycKm7/NXYVYfhxVYZ6u+pAqmsxtZE0j1qkEyHal Yo9pjR/nohEoqMbMSx85E2PvfovuVaZhmlnEB/4xTrz3vkClUcyuM2kFhnT/jipWDqoBqF3TnsHUg 3juJCqk+ZIjn+mRV/01g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oq7vs-008aWV-FU; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 07:13:04 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oq7vp-008aV7-Ii for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 07:13:03 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 534F8B820D3; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 07:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D94D3C433D6; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 07:12:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1667373178; bh=8YSLrlTKEH/zZIjxkCCQNXWTZJ2rwxcYE+d26YpyZhE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GCHRTvzu2C+o/dTeJ1w2KnygFUzicLKPEmKXP8E6REFdfiHlRdHFNcSVW38NntkAe Yf2g0IIWpTQrIVg+Y3E4GePvAmVfVWOwc02ANBuInOB4m/rOY6u1e6oZirNQJWOelb Z6aUE5lXtjdRy1QOJWiS5GZhSXlYf7PWXyN0UOJQ= Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:09:32 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Conor Dooley Cc: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Jiri Slaby , Conor Dooley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: stop selecting device drivers in Kconfig.socs Message-ID: References: <20221005171348.167476-1-conor@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221102_001301_880857_B7D18D87 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:02:09PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 06:13:43PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > From: Conor Dooley > > > > As my RFC [0] series doing the symbol name changes has not yet reached > > consensus, I've split out the removal of device driver selects into a > > new series. I kept the plic as a direct select - although given how Maz > > is treating the SiFive plic driver as the RISC-V plic driver, maybe that > > should just be selected by default at an arch level... > > > > I assume the individual patches can go via their subsystems & I'll > > resubmit the arch/riscv patches a cycle later? I'm not in any rush. > > Hey, > > What's the story here with the two serial patches, they just waiting for > an Ack? I think these are archived on the riscv patchwork, so if that is > the case I'll unarchive them and mark as needing one. Sorry for the delay, I'll take both of them through the tty/serial tree. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv