From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0AD1C4332F for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 22:34:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ljyRQqcn0YA+upCLwjrMhYJYI5l8bmaZGn2OGvFVqOc=; b=P21Z0tgpBJCVt6 Qh87QrqbvQqsnck+fCs6fg7FfZP7uQxPC2qm1PK4KVpk1qemLRyvchVbwh2q8zoSUVdIo/TxYUfkw s1wAs6L0ISQ5gs089sQfBf31OL4to9+Q3Xsxs3D9Mx0DQUxA2ZjBYA8vXkd9qxMX0CqsOnZEZyNoY kbArsTuYjy4sGEQkJdUjTIYUBz/j/474bROimALC0wdk4cfUdBgfwxOL2rTUBanBq+KhGB4KXLvb7 viVkJQdoHB3OEPgCG+s88fchw9lzX17i2sBm1IAgr7DPNDad/jwoNBm80NeFoyv03i6vn1Md6lnXL Eahrm8lvBSX/A/C7jBtQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oqinB-001tJg-TO; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 22:34:33 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oqimv-001tEL-Fn for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 22:34:23 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id l6so3017362pjj.0 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:34:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ldFAJy69ux+7z8nNCEANq8kYxugZwXEN2GoxlipQK+E=; b=mkCIQ7bnuqf5rnZcP6hp5JREtMJ78/S1f1OWtkJaTeRse5OVZRNDMID1AYpz+jBJzg eTpW9c3Fpt1GJSjywJBWRecDimPLsqOLfN7Nt46XLz4VoW6wiMtnGP3QRSBmWb2Jy2Ue XIrU3j6Zv6WjRE+wBsl7MInjLBoh0ETGKk290BPhyym2xqAHPTTSp2piVfBSnA5Xqpa6 3LkVfTkbpSA7y+3xQukW44oEvhoV3ll0HshYQg8WmMixLpenp+usLAkNlELtK9JmVVTO f4CyPp1jxX+2aW0ZdvzjRbMLb0KbcueA1rrAX1kSu3aGK0UrE4ad6SuEvUCcApyckgBR ztmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ldFAJy69ux+7z8nNCEANq8kYxugZwXEN2GoxlipQK+E=; b=XBao0RWgobb9/9L/0ngz/GZqanG38WaFDwx3i64GNu0XOofNbWt4I8KEnZHMJ191rK 8gfm7zGyxBiQarZZwpq5SNh5pnFcH6Tji97VqxMpgLxz3yQqR++ablufVtBQbc/HCRmX UqHAow4b+++I+n4nRqRqUNi0xjdX4fISFTDrWeW2Y+R9+yJh1Jydde4EladwVBgIY9Fz u+hSFzG0Eu/XqEY6GVxIUau2V5Y26BKwi9tcRsNWQ/7ksxMoUvrdxvgNnTHoSe5eHWln PnCk36zz72193eLJhjlxnL7hPVv9gDUPTB5QyGMqGwY+wCb2131ObxTPsBIKgFlGmXk/ S01A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3KMAIJgDDLfpENCpmrDesVBuF/XicvX+y9t3mRj3g01ARcpsjF Dw556jHVa4xyGvLdJhQGLO0PpA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4x/1h/4H3vdmKr9CnvGb6Osipgsi8YDrhqpMcYmjYNzerzqYc2UHi5AhKhfTxXN1DVaborYg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6045:b0:212:fe9a:5792 with SMTP id h5-20020a17090a604500b00212fe9a5792mr49415367pjm.178.1667514854306; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:34:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (7.104.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.104.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u10-20020a170902e80a00b00186ad73e2d5sm1151929plg.208.2022.11.03.15.34.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 22:34:10 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Isaku Yamahata Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Matthew Rosato , Eric Farman , Vitaly Kuznetsov , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Oliver Upton , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Isaku Yamahata , Fabiano Rosas , Michael Ellerman , Chao Gao , Thomas Gleixner , Yuan Yao Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/44] KVM: x86: Do compatibility checks when onlining CPU Message-ID: References: <20221102231911.3107438-1-seanjc@google.com> <20221102231911.3107438-37-seanjc@google.com> <20221103210402.GB1063309@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221103210402.GB1063309@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221103_153422_713005_B74AC236 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.31 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2022, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:19:03PM +0000, > Sean Christopherson wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > index f223c845ed6e..c99222b71fcc 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > > @@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_nested_ops { > > }; > > > > struct kvm_x86_init_ops { > > - int (*check_processor_compatibility)(void); > > + int (*check_processor_compatibility)(int cpu); > > Is this cpu argument used only for error message to include cpu number > with avoiding repeating raw_smp_processor_id() in pr_err()? Yep. > The actual check is done on the current executing cpu. > > If cpu != raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu is wrong. Although the function is called > in non-preemptive context, it's a bit confusing. So voting to remove it and > to use. What if I rename the param is this_cpu? I 100% agree the argument is confusing as-is, but forcing all the helpers to manually grab the cpu is quite annoying. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv