From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FE3C4332F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:21:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=4kh2EURLxhQU6VSV6PR5G49et/jlwDc5qlZLL1LBHEc=; b=Y6AH3U1jzQdYJT UIa3FnGU3ms6wKBMJxFwIcay4TatGMggFD65kjdm5sdR7DcYNGJwuDsdJesUABWG7/YHDfOyFyRzn sOBQRf3U6rfOsNWEVv1UXeIF+kEAfyw3JJrrDcLmV4OI2jluLekWrWfT5U6VnO3tC4RJ74DLgd7Vq NlRVycfvsMC6XspA62jxaPAAXHYvPFIG0q1+93IhCWPRswDjz3OVl0QSH0tAicIhAAELLbsR4AFyU A02qLMB5wl184JNUOTOqMnu3fXAAO4UfqGEsDGisYPN3+2i6nFO71qf59ypv1CiKSgxRDLv6WZw+8 W/qI7B4GA/9/Tkp8W9hA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1osSHs-00702M-Lg; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 17:21:24 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1osSHh-00700M-F1; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 17:21:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2804EB81B4D; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33235C433C1; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:21:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1667928070; bh=DlMHpgYF6fEe5J2HjZk1J+WbnRi5LdPQe3AxBSfoBtA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=o6Cv5V6efM2n7JUbiYlknPcXf5YU+wsfF3ayVGOcCl6KzWjTQfpf9P/DxPBzki7xQ w0H4anKjaubXltO/ORS0AxYyYWMUW02TpkK0lxtNWvEuNTJgxy5kI1HkytTAI3BRMZ qAvnl6sZ56oXhnSc4GjGnL/EEuXmow5ZOmOh+AHCZcmB259ApGTdpLZJ1ZOS6P+ivR pmlVeEFZZ3yQ8sIs02fhYwk5S6jOPy7jynVJbJcbOWbsadqc7XwcQoVD+0PiJOCjQG C/CHCiih+Zy1HlFxwbn2gTA8HRZ2JKgNK6TfgHh2wnDl3aFbqqm+2mzG/YhPqBx/sv mau3HKmmFbgJw== Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:21:04 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Conor Dooley , Pierre Gondois , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Gavin Shan , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Jani Nikula , Jakub Kicinski , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cacheinfo: Use riscv's init_cache_level() as generic OF implem Message-ID: References: <20221108110424.166896-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com> <20221108110424.166896-2-pierre.gondois@arm.com> <20221108155906.3pssiipdfrm55q56@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221108155906.3pssiipdfrm55q56@bogus> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221108_092113_663063_86498DD7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:59:06PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 02:07:41PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 12:04:17PM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: > > > Riscv's implementation of init_of_cache_level() is following > > > > heh, "Riscv" always looks a bit odd! > > Code movement looks fine, nothing surface level is broken on RISC-V. > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley > > > Thanks for the review and testing. I was planning to ask Pierre to cc you > next time but you seem to have covered that for me :). Ye no worries. Feel free to add some sort of "R: Conor Dooley " entry where appropriate if you want to make sure I'll take a look - but I should see it anyway if it goes to the riscv list. Up to you. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv