From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25EADC352A1 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:12:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date :Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8ULd/XJxO/AZsMf5qjsTVbp0ycoprjMAL1hi4JoDVmA=; b=GGUVUy4yEYL7yFM5/HfewZOYKy Nk6dfohtIVuYOZ0vMFVaiGsAuK/Y0y/4iA45F3kn3LOPXjgluZxT3GH5wKeFOUC5b5xqU+I46vjQz dIi2Kb/gsdhZOlZ4eiOn5XHWc9mOgBo2KOwzrYWE+kcSR1wfmtfm9wxhvsldCRnXcjm8qBR9xvMBe nlDYjwuDMHk6zEsh+nOKz9X3Dxpj6NR3KnYCYjSMTyBZeEuHuIOeH59rmDksqAnpCEWwQmIAWLB3g 77uh3EcGAfo8pEa3mVtyykUaNklairiee2LTiS/nE4jiRgtz4rAtL0QLLE5DDHdPGtUZ71k7z+Hxw MY4dn6bQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p2aYm-00EMCY-57; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 16:12:44 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p2aYj-00EM8K-H6; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 16:12:42 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F15F86179C; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA2D0C433C1; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:12:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1670343160; bh=HgFTfC9zyZQkoZmePhkz0MAY8w2m/nlUZpikKauzyNI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EQOA1wFB7IjdbpNtB0kXUsH1jicB3zphJhix3CVdp7LRImEsvXizZS1+It1XCfvu0 lzYC0HGDJUy1Rb2tVGlMB2dxjzI6bNi+p1+UMps0Za75Ua/rrbeVOnP4zBzZuqg3Ik oxl8BGNdB5yXmN6vl62fB4iKA7FITecNLHthCrt6eAb0NEgJ7swPvt5tUdqYgtN2OO E6UToeESPi6hVkSDfw0Jcp0FTiBVgSPEW8jWVNw4pqUzoVgAFUtBwLP6rf10cOIL9M 4XaVIX3Jf8qCdwjqs9ctO1rEo0k3evwFI+FIZAjcyueXUE57OBzDe8MfBwtWKAa+kp zhs7703F9YS1A== Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:12:35 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Jisheng Zhang Cc: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Albert Ou , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Andrew Jones , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives Message-ID: References: <20221204174632.3677-1-jszhang@kernel.org> <10190559.nUPlyArG6x@diego> <12207576.O9o76ZdvQC@diego> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221206_081241_627297_98F381B6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6810460166166572045==" Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============6810460166166572045== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0yfmBJphl5BauK+i" Content-Disposition: inline --0yfmBJphl5BauK+i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:02:35PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > Higher Powers here, but some sort of logical ordering would probably = be > > > a good idea so as not to hold each other up? > > > The non-string bit of your series has been fairly well reviewed & wou= ld, > > > in theory, be mergeable once the tree re-opens? Timing aside, Jisheng= 's > > > idea seems like a good one, no? >=20 > IMHO, it will be better if Palmer can merge Heiko's alternative improveme= nts > into riscv-next once well reviewed and the window is reopen. Then Drew, > Prabhakar and I can rebase on that tree. Unless I missed something, we're saying the same thing in different ways :) --0yfmBJphl5BauK+i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY49p1QAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0h75AQCs7HqktVAyyk++q+81eShEP/hyMgLVqh7NhSCXaYUMIQEA8Fq3lpbnzAbi JQrKm36mZz/R5qyDiB9pd5bml2HvoQA= =xqAW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0yfmBJphl5BauK+i-- --===============6810460166166572045== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv --===============6810460166166572045==--