Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives

Conor Dooley
2022-12-06T16:12:53Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 680 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:02:35PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> > > Higher Powers here, but some sort of logical ordering would probably be
> > > a good idea so as not to hold each other up?
> > > The non-string bit of your series has been fairly well reviewed & would,
> > > in theory, be mergeable once the tree re-opens? Timing aside, Jisheng's
> > > idea seems like a good one, no?
>
> IMHO, it will be better if Palmer can merge Heiko's alternative improvements
> into riscv-next once well reviewed and the window is reopen. Then Drew,
> Prabhakar and I can rebase on that tree.

Unless I missed something, we're saying the same thing in different ways
:)

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]