From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCD8C43217 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 19:46:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=4HwHP5gRRa1Hg9m4XQKTfk7TOhai5FliBK7XtxMEyZ0=; b=O+tHVCAulwVYVQ E3La/nmhY+0nygzbiJ+6UqhudLcM0uLj73ul5uiBX2susN7ISzcNDtzT2+3NMGLnE8TgvsQ6ugBI6 i3ztKtvpx9807GcEpNgISV5YL2T1vjCBBZdS8t1y5uDN78nIjyVesoIZRtiD5BXs/SSngASoeOaCY IjxZ+xEKMq9ziBigxNt9zGQWRpSCj6YSv969yC1TD4SD7UB1qgCQtfGcaTG4ZpkZjeGOv4/IL+2el tkuUxhW54P7VgzEY69/WVOE8Vgre2Fj+eolLMOY3ZxpPcBhReImUCsXPMc/5QOwt2vrmP/66jnyy/ H01FmQO7JUG8SIfAV6MQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0pWA-00AdKl-Oa; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:46:46 +0000 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([156.67.10.101]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0pS7-00AXoV-2S for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:42:36 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=qHbGOUcw32092wDitkDdj/NcFV0kIbthIjQW9oIXmWU=; b=lebdUAMMbR6wv/+txOdgsXeA7U 4TR4n6bN4En6BtjDtifGT/jC4Jvz8O/7se6Fv58sfVBmNfYQLzdVlJTvj/tAtIdY+MiIOFdxZLNK+ OdCqIrxJgG0DHIieV12z+1GboXk0JEpAlwBuqjZYtTtiuRGlpBE065kNMCnr/lfBK5Rk=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1p0pS3-0045jA-0Z; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 20:42:31 +0100 Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:42:30 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Conor Dooley Cc: Yanhong Wang , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Emil Renner Berthing , Richard Cochran , Heiner Kallweit , Peter Geis Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] riscv: dts: starfive: visionfive-v2: Add phy delay_chain configuration Message-ID: References: <20221201090242.2381-1-yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com> <20221201090242.2381-8-yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221201_114235_156168_83F8B5DA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:30:16PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:49:08PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:02:42PM +0800, Yanhong Wang wrote: > > > riscv: dts: starfive: visionfive-v2: Add phy delay_chain configuration > > > > > > Add phy delay_chain configuration to support motorcomm phy driver for > > > StarFive VisionFive 2 board. > > nit: please re-word this commit next time around to actually say what > you're doing here. I didn't notice it initially, but this patch is doing > a lot more than adding `delay_chain` configuration. To my dwmac unaware > brain, there's nothing hits for that term outside of the changelog :( Hi Conor I suspect once we see the documentation of the binding, it will get rejected and implemented differently. So i would not worry too much about this at the moment. Andrew _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv