From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F4046C4332F for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:32:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=V4BAiaSY6m37d2ifLxks+rlVFnM1I8BMO2M2lRzxcQQ=; b=3jhMdXVeVlTPbe nf2XFRB1HKGl6H5D20ExLuIt87TRGCd12SpcV1wgZGQikLff5IVOQTDdhnXfzJQthjl2VOdXXkQ7c WSsGLnZOPoDWQAO3y8thBfbq5BLzB3dqlOrD545kPxb78wyVQxvfpnpXcX1PLZMl0640eGjDgCv+I 7O9WF6wRBPhSTQExtVRsoyQJtfIf5xgfEJv66r/ejrGz/qD88Kzgz/jZT7xlyFO8xT2BfjrBW5eg9 Zcbe+oD5ytKKTnoAxNQl8jW52JUGzyVdwfDpHNTZZNX8H1zjXfLQlR0s0fmv33m+Yysnhj+spWP+5 z7EU4S5YBMVxv38JyCrw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p4kmT-001DTB-Ex; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:31:49 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p4kmQ-001DRY-6Y for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:31:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E193460AB0; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA88CC433D2; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:31:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1670859104; bh=LGTDnYxBg9eysLN7OOJxfD3B53BIGfwpGXnUlfr6wak=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kDm7uU0dlJ43C/A5FT3EW4FfV20bzGiIHOtUks/5Z5R8x7YozXLTyaNkS1lvH2G+H x12Ps0r0J3BtQaXzVsS9TR4mkQuHLu7v8mRrHIKUrVPIAbDDWM6HUiK86s9Z6cLiqO khhIh2bGDshjEFrw+PE2eUW6jKxiQWFRHLVbOCzBAGSe2pnCh5lKlvFYIE0U60hxNH 04Ik88zPydTbty7ah8HPpKrD+m95EkI7pFUOBpUzyMDk8l/aVgAyRjk7OMEsUXK6do UozyoJKpcnsWMRDJuyHa5O7N983skzLZed+hhmQSTKzrXU0I9oLsaPoJR0c8JNH2XY Nl3Ae0WNilNdQ== Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 23:21:45 +0800 From: Jisheng Zhang To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: ajones@ventanamicro.com, Paul Walmsley , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] riscv: vdso: remove hardcoded 0x800 .text section start addr Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221212_073146_384609_25F6941E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 39.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 11:02:18AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:11:05 PST (-0800), jszhang@kernel.org wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:32:55AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 12:18:05AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > > > It seems the hardcoded 0x800 isn't necessary, but removing it brings a > > > > > > s/, but/and/ > > > > > > > small vdso.so and aligns with other architectures. > > > > > > This commit message didn't really satisfy my desire to understand why > > > the comment and '. = 0x800' were there in the first place and if its safe > > > to remove now, so I tried to do some of my own digging. I found > > > > > > commit 5b9304933730 ("x86 vDSO: generate vdso-syms.lds") > > > commit f6b46ebf904f ("x86 vDSO: new layout") > > > > > > which removes the comment and hard coding for x86 by changing the vdso > > > Makefile. Then looking at > > > > > > commit 9031fefde6f2 ("arm64: VDSO support") > > > > > > we see that it starts with the new Makefile approach and doesn't bother > > > with the hard coding from the start. As riscv also started with the new > > > Makefile approach it also could have dropped the hard coding from the > > > start (I guess). > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > > > --- > > > > arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 8 +------- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S > > > > index 150b1a572e61..7be7e618d59c 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S > > > > @@ -31,13 +31,7 @@ SECTIONS > > > > > > > > .rodata : { *(.rodata .rodata.* .gnu.linkonce.r.*) } > > > > > > > > - /* > > > > - * This linker script is used both with -r and with -shared. > > > > - * For the layouts to match, we need to skip more than enough > > > > - * space for the dynamic symbol table, etc. If this amount is > > > > - * insufficient, ld -shared will error; simply increase it here. > > > > - */ > > > > - . = 0x800; > > > > + . = ALIGN(4); > > > > > > I realize 4 is used here now because I questioned the 16, but after doing > > > my digging I think a larger alignment may be better. Loading the text may > > > be done with 8 byte or larger reads, so having the section aligned to a > > > larger size would be better reading it. We might as well use 16, like > > > arm64 does, and like you had before? > > > > > > Also, having enough separation between data and text seems to be > > > important for cache reasons, based on the comment in > > > ./arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso-layout.lds.S and other vdso history. > > > Maybe we should move .note, .eh_frame_hdr, and .eh_frame below > > > .rodata like x86 has it? > > > > > > > Thank you so much for pointing out the two commits and above > > separation, new version will be sent out soon. > > Not sure if I missed the v2? I can't find one. When I want to sent a v2, I just knew that patches after rc7 won't be merged for next rc1. Sorry for not being earlier. Will send out v2 once new developement window is reopen. Thanks _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv