Re: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V kasan rework

From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V kasan rework
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 22:01:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6TTvku/yuSjm42j@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221216162141.1701255-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2760 bytes --]

Hey Alex!

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 05:21:35PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> As described in patch 2, our current kasan implementation is intricate,
> so I tried to simplify the implementation and mimic what arm64/x86 are
> doing.

I'm not sure that I am going to have much to contribute for this series,
but I did notice some difficulty actually applying it. At whatever point
you sent it, the pwbot did actually give it a shakedown - but it doesn't
apply any of the "usual suspects" tree wise.
It looks like multiple patches interact with commit 9f2ac64d6ca6 ("riscv:
mm: add missing memcpy in kasan_init"), which caused me some difficulty
that was not just a trivial resolution.
A rebase on top of v6.2-rc1 is (I would imagine) a good idea for this
series?

For the future, perhaps using the base-commit arg would be useful for
stuff like this :)

> In addition it fixes UEFI bootflow with a kasan kernel and kasan inline
> instrumentation: all kasan configurations were tested on a large ubuntu
> kernel with success with KASAN_KUNIT_TEST and KASAN_MODULE_TEST.
> 
> inline ubuntu config + uefi:
>  sv39: OK
>  sv48: OK
>  sv57: OK
> 
> outline ubuntu config + uefi:
>  sv39: OK
>  sv48: OK
>  sv57: OK
> 
> Actually 1 test always fails with KASAN_KUNIT_TEST that I have to check:
> # kasan_bitops_generic: EXPECTATION FAILED at mm/kasan/kasan__test.c:1020
> KASAN failure expected in "set_bit(nr, addr)", but none occurrred
> 
> Note that Palmer recently proposed to remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from the
> userspace abi
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221211061358.28035-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/T/
> so that we can finally increase the command line to fit all kasan kernel
> parameters.
> 
> All of this should hopefully fix the syzkaller riscv build that has been
> failing for a few months now, any test is appreciated and if I can help
> in any way, please ask.
> 
> Alexandre Ghiti (6):
>   riscv: Split early and final KASAN population functions
>   riscv: Rework kasan population functions
>   riscv: Move DTB_EARLY_BASE_VA to the kernel address space
>   riscv: Fix EFI stub usage of KASAN instrumented string functions
>   riscv: Fix ptdump when KASAN is enabled
>   riscv: Unconditionnally select KASAN_VMALLOC if KASAN
> 
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                    |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/kernel/image-vars.h        |   8 -
>  arch/riscv/mm/init.c                  |   2 +-
>  arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c            | 511 ++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c                |  24 +-
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile |   7 +-
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/string.c | 133 +++++++
>  7 files changed, 435 insertions(+), 251 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.37.2
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv