From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200A6C433DB for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC36B64E45 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:52:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AC36B64E45 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=9hK0YlRl9SEKxHevR/wyzCzr6PbvtW5N1mMWUmZMoh8=; b=WwB0/U970tI780Gyu5SoONust vAfSQksEnpYmuT1qnkpCIkvmczsVp4+RVMKinoi8im18bV1U5a3WCdPb/c1gAaobXGjhTzucJeAzx sgetzz1P2FisC+pK9BS4medb36wFXaTHWI4aIhfhNDAKRBrflnFE1bVeObHWMVZ4hDMs10039EkX/ 945FhS7JkF/tfna2e5PTjuU/vpDv0zHNHKoEhr4SOSG40dDoV1tUZ/tyb8lAdy/fAPjs7xZjfFlWh fcpqZs+oFWs6XsKgG0nrDYNMhiDDMpA4SL06vfmQrvfOaSoFGjZ7T2LJ71+isUHtFZ94ne62P8/h7 tDQieRq1w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l9492-0001MJ-2S; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:51:52 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l948x-0001KM-9j; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:51:48 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1612781506; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HqDzYZJj1JL8yulwepFTzNw6Mh0UlkDMkwLo91us+Nw=; b=NW6cSXQt5vKQIC6IyRBjI03RsTggfacnmMQkPXVlyHTYQnhUREooi7Orv+OqfRI7917Lxz 3nZxkT5RnnKOC3tcopxasEwHneBW4NQ+AZ2h7Uzl6P3ycEWbNjYfJ5Lj058U4V6l82Ro1L 1F8EZ3u1FlnDVFRaGEZB3SZ5/MOrsnY= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE41AC6E; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:51:45 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 08/10] PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users Message-ID: References: <20210208084920.2884-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20210208084920.2884-9-rppt@kernel.org> <38c0cad4-ac55-28e4-81c6-4e0414f0620a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <38c0cad4-ac55-28e4-81c6-4e0414f0620a@redhat.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210208_055147_488367_03BB27F1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Christopher Lameter , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Elena Reshetova , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Tycho Andersen , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Will Deacon , x86@kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Mike Rapoport , Ingo Molnar , Michael Kerrisk , Palmer Dabbelt , Arnd Bergmann , James Bottomley , Hagen Paul Pfeifer , Borislav Petkov , Alexander Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Walmsley , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Palmer Dabbelt , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt , Andrew Morton , Rick Edgecombe , Roman Gushchin , Mike Rapoport Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon 08-02-21 11:32:11, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 08.02.21 11:18, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 08-02-21 10:49:18, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > From: Mike Rapoport > > > > > > It is unsafe to allow saving of secretmem areas to the hibernation > > > snapshot as they would be visible after the resume and this essentially > > > will defeat the purpose of secret memory mappings. > > > > > > Prevent hibernation whenever there are active secret memory users. > > > > Does this feature need any special handling? As it is effectivelly > > unevictable memory then it should behave the same as other mlock, ramfs > > which should already disable hibernation as those cannot be swapped out, > > no? > > > > Why should unevictable memory not go to swap when hibernating? We're merely > dumping all of our system RAM (including any unmovable allocations) to swap > storage and the system is essentially completely halted. > My understanding is that mlock is never really made visible via swap storage. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv