From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ERROR: modpost: "boot_cpu_hartid" [arch/riscv/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined!
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 18:34:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZvipLmkQQZ3va8F@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZvP3AuTdEdje/IY@angband.pl>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi!
> With CONFIG_KVM=m and CONFIG_SMP=n, the build fails with:
> ERROR: modpost: "boot_cpu_hartid" [arch/riscv/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined!
>
> An obvious fix would be to change riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask() from a
> static inline function to a real exported symbol
Amusingly, the !SMP version is buggy as it assumes the boot/only CPU is in the
target mask, which will not always be true, e.g. if a VM has more vCPUs than there
are pCPUs in the system, kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_ecall() can send in a mask without any
CPUs set. Even if that's somewhat of a bogus use case, arguably a common helper
shouldn't have different semantics for SMP vs !SMP.
> but I wonder: is there a point in allowing such combinations that no one will
> test?
Eh, even if there is currently no known use case, unless the fix is really nasty,
there's no reason to actively prevent a potentially legitimate use case. But it's
somewhat of a moot point as the easy fix is to use the SMP version for both cases.
I think this would be an appropriate fix?
From f6510acd68feb90aa3ec393031cbcde725c52420 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:01:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Use common riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask() for both
SMP=y and SMP=n
Use what is currently the SMP=y version of riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask()
for both SMP=y and SMP=n to fix a build failure with KVM=m and SMP=n due
to boot_cpu_hartid not being exported. This also fixes a second bug
where the SMP=n version assumes the sole CPU in the system is in the
incoming mask, which may not hold true in kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_ecall() if
the KVM guest VM has multiple vCPUs (on a SMP=n system).
Reported-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Fixes: 1ef46c231df4 ("RISC-V: Implement new SBI v0.2 extensions")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h | 10 ++--------
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 10 ++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c | 10 ----------
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h
index a7d2811f3536..62d0e6e61da8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(struct cpumask *mask);
void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
int riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(int hartid);
-void riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(const struct cpumask *in, struct cpumask *out);
/* Set custom IPI operations */
void riscv_set_ipi_ops(const struct riscv_ipi_ops *ops);
@@ -85,13 +84,6 @@ static inline unsigned long cpuid_to_hartid_map(int cpu)
return boot_cpu_hartid;
}
-static inline void riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(const struct cpumask *in,
- struct cpumask *out)
-{
- cpumask_clear(out);
- cpumask_set_cpu(boot_cpu_hartid, out);
-}
-
static inline void riscv_set_ipi_ops(const struct riscv_ipi_ops *ops)
{
}
@@ -102,6 +94,8 @@ static inline void riscv_clear_ipi(void)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+void riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(const struct cpumask *in, struct cpumask *out);
+
#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) && (CONFIG_SMP)
bool cpu_has_hotplug(unsigned int cpu);
#else
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index b9620e5f00ba..6c5caf5eb906 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -59,6 +59,16 @@ atomic_t hart_lottery __section(".sdata")
unsigned long boot_cpu_hartid;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices);
+void riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(const struct cpumask *in, struct cpumask *out)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ cpumask_clear(out);
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, in)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu), out);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask);
+
/*
* Place kernel memory regions on the resource tree so that
* kexec-tools can retrieve them from /proc/iomem. While there
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c
index 921d9d7df400..d0147294691d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smp.c
@@ -59,16 +59,6 @@ int riscv_hartid_to_cpuid(int hartid)
return -ENOENT;
}
-void riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(const struct cpumask *in, struct cpumask *out)
-{
- int cpu;
-
- cpumask_clear(out);
- for_each_cpu(cpu, in)
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu), out);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask);
-
bool arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id)
{
return phys_id == cpuid_to_hartid_map(cpu);
--
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-22 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 17:14 ERROR: modpost: "boot_cpu_hartid" [arch/riscv/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined! Adam Borowski
2021-11-22 18:34 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-11-23 5:33 ` Anup Patel
2021-11-23 15:07 ` Atish Patra
2021-11-29 21:23 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZvipLmkQQZ3va8F@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=anup.patel@wdc.com \
--cc=kilobyte@angband.pl \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox