From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E882C43219 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:23:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=DVHNYshV/8yB/BHLvVpN/NvZSMCyePhv5GOnz/FNELo=; b=UtnCn3X32n9Vyx iM2dyYdZU3ucpAPvWhj8FEYmpkGGl+XAwBMQKaNg9GvNmbCoOcfQwZolxDj50F8qaZkgo3wiMLf00 zGSCMDN5SHjXbfhI1c/KZU3Vg/y6JgwCoWxEuOh2Y5z7MLNiAw3a4dRId1mHbkp0MOx7YXa3tn6QK BeGAjqvrYB4Mfto6ZfXoU1w4fPZIIwzE+MzHeFuEpgCu1E9OEcwVNWKZqkI11zyxfiTQmiIqCQHLt Y24J5ioaPk41D6qEfVWgI4rsnhTx124qCl7dhHh8fSO0OUxbARkl8klW+oIABqAbVSt9kmFXqm3+r 5unEEDHaijCp+eHMewdA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nEVi6-009JnF-Bw; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:23:06 +0000 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nEVi4-009JmW-Jp; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:23:04 +0000 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:23:04 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: guoren@kernel.org Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, arnd@arndb.de, anup@brainfault.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, liush@allwinnertech.com, wefu@redhat.com, drew@beagleboard.org, wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, Guo Ren , Anup Patel Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/17] riscv: Fixup difference with defconfig Message-ID: References: <20220129121728.1079364-1-guoren@kernel.org> <20220129121728.1079364-6-guoren@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220129121728.1079364-6-guoren@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 08:17:16PM +0800, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > From: Guo Ren > > Let's follow the origin patch's spirit: > > The only difference between rv32_defconfig and defconfig is that > rv32_defconfig has CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I=y. > > This is helpful to compare rv64-compat-rv32 v.s. rv32-linux. > > Fixes: 1b937e8faa87ccfb ("RISC-V: Add separate defconfig for 32bit systems") > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren Wouldn't a common.config that generats both the 32-bit and 64-bit configs a better idea? _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv