From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C38ECAAD1 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 07:04:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Z+w13ikqz+oVaQ4ksDivrrjX3NiN3ux597yMSmjDodE=; b=0KT3ccjw5S/Fvt EGbCW/rdUDcSRLFagPGKF7snCaqY4d0K9d1rLdl003xpNjuWUsv2LoYFxouIZPEwu/oEyKgD7zCaa HW3owdTVxmFa8fl/V59OvftiZ7rl7jlciwuy5nM+bCNpmT1/spKME3iVNm7B8ZU7Dy9tT9dKZpWDf tEgnAsB43q54g7CAHDJlgYQkZCmzbBf+U7d4yb6Smcx2ISkEXa2QxBNPfE77iQu4LIheh3CnMdH7s 96DhXEzOJKtU8Lw8i63QVWVctWpiljKKfyLys3/kX1fvkm/qwGbOWF5zybPl0i0+/0e3G6fdvlocO J1VV+tQLYOAuowB2zmug==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oTeFL-00AAvw-4N; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:04:15 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oTeFI-00AAu3-Kb; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:04:13 +0000 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:04:05 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1662015847; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+6TS55y82TYJlsjJwC1/zBEVFCDtqxUms69ssI0wGGA=; b=3RxOlbonJl5WFm8YJXSc0uAQRFGPk+DSXUCw++ela5eCvo5xJkEVEUbMFxjkRyt19MarwZ DNPfLMrc24rrP9cADg9WhtlDUH6D5/PLLhdIz0NBges7lyBseRZRYTfcJvMhwU5BukTgcj Qkk+/yYaiT1ncZcPjrLdFt457h+D1Q6GEFoPPsoEmThVEozsGEjuWS+sS3soDzXHd1a43A dgejUhFMJAQ3RGqwdu3fieeFS22nB1+g+aMmCins0gGqPEumNbs5hm3ZU3rb4FW6BLdtIK rfO0argpb218v1MWsH+roKH4nSfLKhYboE/AEt+Wjj88GouOyYLDeNyhzyd4LQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1662015847; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+6TS55y82TYJlsjJwC1/zBEVFCDtqxUms69ssI0wGGA=; b=0lKMXKwZ85CHlGzucCsfuA1C4+BIzcDZjLS7nOki0RRQQtjslBtagCDNvKZIOeW3XCncam fnw0X6HxbUgwxXAQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Jisheng Zhang Cc: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] riscv: add PREEMPT_RT support Message-ID: References: <20220831175920.2806-1-jszhang@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220831175920.2806-1-jszhang@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220901_000412_857903_0D0E98E9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.17 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2022-09-01 01:59:15 [+0800], Jisheng Zhang wrote: > I assume patch1, patch2 and patch3 can be reviewed and merged for > riscv-next, patch4 and patch5 can be reviewed and maintained in rt tree, > and finally merged once the remaining patches in rt tree are all > mainlined. I would say so, yes. What about JUMP_LABEL support? Do you halt all CPUs while patching the code? Sebastian _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv