From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B924ECAAD8 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:34:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1cRtUxlDf1ZHqBhzTdi4qRImYY+Q+XjICprUqCjBUVs=; b=4dmGazTjqz/FZU N/LG8Zq7zcRIjWP9jSVyQUjuqmWTPnXxj1Lo102FM/YaUFFX/heRoXih8xLd0gWrV3bBN1DEFolgx JeldTSQrcXwW7MFi4AfAluSgDDAUMc93cC6Hdsydj8fOx8TzWr0oatJxYIk6BOTAZu9Pc6OwXopqE ieoLbRb5Oc786HhRO5nRYv2H2HHV0WW5tFCNU3UBBTLnTrjypWrD5CYb37+ijCwYN1R7DSZMcz0EK Wf4jhTB/TuwYpl/fd7ujnFyhX+BOTWcN9B2GjIOsSbUtI0nS9U7u3tT5D9VBptJ4MOjpMe7efOZKs t0R9J/1snkDr6lBofUFw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ob7Lw-00CjPG-MP; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:33:56 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ob7Lt-00CjOc-Np; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:33:55 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B3BB82965; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D539DC433C1; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:33:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1663796030; bh=/o/C8WBjZU0WtQ0lZ7PQqvBy0u0PM9V+gpKwcGhMpdk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=muhOV/8U1MntF0rfcYR+7I7EiBzki5VmmYk9z5mvm6+JKMbPsQQtUS9ZvR2ZKcbqw x704QFWHe/Fod/KyotBkc78uI8vxyh/4MhMK4A/cCCdrwM0wDhglJB1MSIEeVm8P64 LmFnz5zeT5hhaeQG6nnm7WXK2IcBI84HRa5GmdQXKCicV7ZjdUDQwIJJtKGLKFM7Uf Pc0UozbcVhiUnMkMP7yZR6yWZLhehX2I2N75BOKf7kmQU6vv5vcyANSHCTRHzZAP6M SpPmAa6wXXjLeV4/jBSTm7BM0aR5cAA0pNlK75haWSIm/zhV9z3RZtffcaaxLHnHRY F2W+LYmEtWh0g== Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 22:33:46 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Chris Stillson Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Guo Ren , Guo Ren , Anup Patel , Greentime Hu , Palmer Dabbelt Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] riscv: Extending cpufeature.c to detect V-extension Message-ID: References: <20220921194629.1480202-1-stillson@rivosinc.com> <20220921194629.1480202-3-stillson@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220921_143353_959490_2EDCCED7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.31 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 09:11:56PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 12:46:14PM -0700, Chris Stillson wrote: > > Hey Chris, > > Looks like this only partially made it to the list. The cover letter is > missing as are a bunch of the patches in the middle, see: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220921194629.1480202-3-stillson@rivosinc.com/T/#t nvm, rest of it seems to have finally made it through now. > Also, when you run format-patch to generate the patches, please add the > `-v` flag with a number so that the patchset gets the version number > added to it. > > Ohh, and Palmer's non-rivos email looks wrong? Rest still applies though & rerolling as v12 would be nice so that the tools don't get confused about which version is which since you've now sent a pair of v1s. Your SoB is still missing from the individual patches too. Getting there though, this one is at least threaded & the patches are not whitespace damaged/line wrapped anymore AFAICT. Thanks, Conor. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv