From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Qinglin Pan <panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
palmer@dabbelt.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
jeff@riscv.org, xuyinan@ict.ac.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] riscv: mm: modify pte format for Svnapot
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 20:47:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz8w0dozxbyz311O@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <071c426e-16be-2720-41c4-cede59e2d82b@iscas.ac.cn>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 10:46:36PM +0800, Qinglin Pan wrote:
> On 10/5/22 10:17 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 07:29:23PM +0800, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn wrote:
> > > From: Qinglin Pan <panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn>
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
> > > index dc42375c2357..1cd0ffbfbdaa 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h
> > > @@ -74,6 +74,19 @@ typedef struct {
> > > */
> > > #define _PAGE_PFN_MASK GENMASK(53, 10)
> > > +/*
> > > + * [63] Svnapot definitions:
> > > + * 0 Svnapot disabled
> > > + * 1 Svnapot enabled
> > > + */
> > > +#define _PAGE_NAPOT_SHIFT 63
> > > +#define _PAGE_NAPOT BIT(_PAGE_NAPOT_SHIFT)
> > > +#define NAPOT_CONT64KB_ORDER 4UL
> > > +#define NAPOT_CONT64KB_SHIFT (NAPOT_CONT64KB_ORDER + PAGE_SHIFT)
> > > +#define NAPOT_CONT64KB_SIZE BIT(NAPOT_CONT64KB_SHIFT)
> > > +#define NAPOT_CONT64KB_MASK (NAPOT_CONT64KB_SIZE - 1UL)
> > > +#define NAPOT_64KB_PTE_NUM BIT(NAPOT_CONT64KB_ORDER)
> >
> > I still wonder if we shouldn't future-proof a bit with something like
> >
> > /*
> > * Only 64KB (order 4) napot ptes supported.
> > */
> > #define napot_cont_order(pte) 4
> >
> > #define napot_cont_shift(order) ((order) + PAGE_SHIFT)
> > #define napot_cont_size(order) BIT(napot_cont_shift(order))
> > #define napot_cont_mask(order) BIT(napot_cont_size(order) - 1)
> > #define napot_pte_num(order) BIT(order)
>
> Maybe we can declare legal napot order in a enum, and use the enum with
> these macros you have mentioned above. I will try to do this in the v8
> patchset.
I'm in a bit of a "keep it simple" camp for these things, I had to run
through this last time to make sure to myself that it made sense. I
think Drew's version is easier to follow despite (or due to?) the
"future-proofing". Whatever you do, a comment wouldn't go amiss I think.
Thanks,
Conor.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-06 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-05 11:29 [PATCH v6 0/4] riscv, mm: detect svnapot cpu support at runtime panqinglin2020
2022-10-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] riscv: mm: modify pte format for Svnapot panqinglin2020
2022-10-05 14:17 ` Andrew Jones
2022-10-05 14:46 ` Qinglin Pan
2022-10-06 19:47 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-10-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] riscv: mm: support Svnapot in physical page linear-mapping panqinglin2020
2022-10-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] riscv: mm: support Svnapot in hugetlb page panqinglin2020
2022-10-05 11:29 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] riscv: mm: support Svnapot in huge vmap panqinglin2020
2022-10-05 13:29 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] riscv, mm: detect svnapot cpu support at runtime Andrew Jones
2022-10-06 19:37 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yz8w0dozxbyz311O@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=jeff@riscv.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=xuyinan@ict.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox