From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A23C433FE for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:25:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Nm1HJWJXgn3hZgK77ebkCkvaEkLifyCIlI79xTn09G0=; b=AUSJFEsVvoLGqh doWXS2s3/teBcIRBvWec5pEXUrxxDlxnQdqDAFzwKwd5mjIH+lmijrMHS7lviJ9+BFNKbp6NPOZMM +weq9nOVTO33gWPOSWiVmYyDylavwArKwauAN6QEgCwueXlG/H6smA/BUgOHdY/1RNA+fqMT0pbTN dDoYac7KxVcdHnihC1S9nBYa5tWTdk6vaiBpp1QeXfB11GcncEkJ2IVUfkXBitpF9nCf0KIWzx2a0 txFsnXFf6zeeeXwvcI3lUU51P98XPlj8PSXNMCoYC1IoBI7zHwANyXufYYfhaHatuRkwzgMFda3ds 5esf7WzbyZ5IzfvQZ7ew==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ofeAm-0096y9-IY; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 09:25:08 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ofeAj-0096xf-NY for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 09:25:07 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1664875505; x=1696411505; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=2Kb3nXyDur4jZeWdOpzva3QGMLIiYTPLkrI4tiW/T+0=; b=cWhIAiXCNPo4JqWVN+MW8BuA/ZdhgzifjGqOBRM/Ho85sp5njgqTueTU l30Amjzutb0blekXRAlDhsLPpH/oAfvvV0Sy0H6e/897CyYOm7OMWHjnW XwemVk3NYJQs1n+wjnv+RktD+ethG9OT8xS6bJ4VCuLCRLcRM1X5hHj0A 8HOK7TePnw2TVu7DYdLPz+nFPS4hJp4c5SOFF3zwSn6ow0GiLTIMbzi5n Shu+lRxJ+K1rtn5c/j2yCqaMSJkDQYn6Qi5xC2pAEaT8GhatO+vha2CIS BVFBKIHsFqsiAQb6CxSXdhq2FJ/CV2fkLWZzF8bWnXEhYawF9Xp/Gxslm Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,367,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="116730128" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 04 Oct 2022 02:25:02 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 02:25:02 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 02:24:59 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:24:37 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Linus Walleij CC: Rob Herring , Hal Feng , Rob Herring , Emil Renner Berthing , Philipp Zabel , , Albert Ou , Paul Walmsley , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , , , Michael Turquette , , , Stephen Boyd , Palmer Dabbelt , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 23/30] pinctrl: starfive: Rename "pinctrl-starfive" to "pinctrl-starfive-jh7100" Message-ID: References: <20220929143225.17907-1-hal.feng@linux.starfivetech.com> <20220930061404.5418-1-hal.feng@linux.starfivetech.com> <166457324093.1075476.18009315584754055366.robh@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221004_022505_854765_2B50DC56 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 29.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 10:21:24AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:13:37AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:59 AM Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 10:48:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:28 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:14:04 +0800, Hal Feng wrote: > > > > > > From: Jianlong Huang > > > > > > > > > > > > Add the SoC name to make it more clear. Also the next generation StarFive > > > > > > SoCs will use "pinctrl-starfive" as the core of StarFive pinctrl driver. > > > > > > No functional change. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianlong Huang > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hal Feng > > > > > > --- > > > > > > .../bindings/pinctrl/starfive,jh7100-pinctrl.yaml | 2 +- > > > > > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7100-beaglev-starlight.dts | 2 +- > > > > > > drivers/pinctrl/starfive/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > > > > drivers/pinctrl/starfive/Makefile | 2 +- > > > > > > .../{pinctrl-starfive.c => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.c} | 2 +- > > > > > > .../{pinctrl-starfive.h => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.h} | 6 +++--- > > > > > > 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > rename drivers/pinctrl/starfive/{pinctrl-starfive.c => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.c} (99%) > > > > > > rename include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/{pinctrl-starfive.h => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.h} (98%) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > > > > > > > > > Would be good to pull this out separately and apply for 6.1. It's kind > > > > > of messy with cross tree dependencies. > > > > > > > > OK I applied this for V6.1. > > > > > > Will this need to be done immutably so it can be pulled into the riscv > > > tree in case this gets applied as a late change for 6.1: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/c5169131-486e-9808-ba48-b7abe1be6a99@collabora.com/ > > > > Always one finger on the fast-forward button have we? ;) > > Dunno what you mean by that mate, sorry! > > I just saw the mail wanted to have the decency to reply to that fellow s/wanted/want > & tell him to rebase after rc1 to avoid a conflict. > > > Rob's point was that I should apply this for v6.1 so that exactly > > that kind of cross-dependencies and immutable branches could > > be avoided for the v6.2 development cycle. > > > > The merge window is already open, it's a bit late for completely > > new stuff I think. > > History suggests otherwise, but I'd be lying if I said I disagreed. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv