From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C82FC64EC4 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:15:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=QF+pVfGlMtBRhq3nSOzW17TUhfWSAY/vLzEEkc9gx1M=; b=Pp786fmGLoyuxd QAvjDhXkVH0Z+Olz3Fhm1XHkstEkte4MLWDtbIPuVVi0CgOAwEYA7wghnHlSTMwDLB1wSx8GGlgku rgcHS/oB/Z1pTEp/7NaRyxCqPTw1ucGg0siytNVGJZPh92iaxK1GI3MTR3991RaQe6MC+D8N3ZTj6 6iNXgmU8NPUN6GnBS+stCebOlWoFOWvT6TLnMsnlLsxy17mnI13oodTDocvtCQOzqkfglwgYJNG9X d2LB/yMHmuBYC48g0pJFP1ayY02tgy8x6Cbi3tu0KoH4H3a6GkK1bY8cykt8XqZe9FZRHznD8iHTe V4qbqS0p0rr7ceXoKKaA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1paIv4-00BE53-Ua; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 16:15:06 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1paIv2-00BE4E-NR for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 16:15:06 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE875B81FB0; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0031AC433EF; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:15:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1678378501; bh=HcwHDBfFsKMC1NScBUvgLRXeM273n/hMohRdHJg+Xh4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fBn4ORoJgJ9/ZDEE2QDPdiUpLhPiB3wJmlLoxIWFeUqajPrUSr+S11Zigs2yTXH96 kkTgc+dwJ7CKAesmoXOXwMrbASlFFyuTfSDrlvwyXnsqF/QuP52I3WFxRH+4uBmUWi HrYhjtJs4yCrPkjhHWFvi6esIdYgZGPSUpxPcNjQ= Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:14:58 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Nick Alcock Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] MODULE_LICENSE removals, fifth tranche Message-ID: References: <20230228130215.289081-1-nick.alcock@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230228130215.289081-1-nick.alcock@oracle.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230309_081504_946374_3DF49B2F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 01:01:55PM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote: > This series, based on current modules-next, is part of a treewide cleanup > suggested by Luis Chamberlain, to remove the LICENSE_MODULE usage from > files/objects that are not tristate. Due to recent changes to kbuild, these > uses are now problematic. See the commit logs for more details. Why isn't kbuild fixed instead? These files can have MODULE_AUTHOR() and other macros when built into the kernel, what is so special about MODULE_LICENSE() that prevents this from working properly? There should not be a need to remove these markings in my opinion, why treat one MODULE_* macro more special than others? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv