From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D4EC74A5B for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:44:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=LokLAN8Mrj4xyZPawHHeSNHL3WEozemEaJ8EHzEPf7o=; b=L2f+Vha+GEOAJb 0JDhx0QByPyP30XAj5hVukXWvP7NILI7fSa0OHCHlrfJmqGpvgRsVixnG6fcoK3l1mZWy04rEQ0ky J7RDQtw0CakhRLqsCTm8tKttQoGurGaCU7YfuZg96WN2XLm7Zh/+hP1SUjvBALNzh24QjzH1hwZdz Fz8SftYmbhuDxSdxlxDcPFcmKHCMsCjHSK3j/hLYRyeuRsZos5Kn7r8vXcf1s4Bd2+SaaAwS9CDEe omk0iJDWttRxMs/MiihW+JKD7WAajrnuidKYdB+47fU5r9pH3CDFy1GtP4Hq9DbbsCiFSkvmCZ4De RwEIWU9m+QEmrtsLn5Pg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1phamJ-001WFn-30; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:44:11 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1phamG-001WEB-2j for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:44:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E19B81E4A; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 241FAC433D2; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:44:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1680115441; bh=AdTMFlaA1yVpN8yNukEmcL6Sup36/1XqYQqUHYbspDs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gchDkbybXrNa2nr5NVf2u/a3UBLqWO4oDXNai1+pd0Y+WcT05699mtknFCZ6mC04k f4eBJXcNS8WKaxncS4UezFbxNraVBIXjwNwnyi/iwFeeJEpv2y/ABSUFjbR6za1oor o0Us/G/C9mS0f03HI4KvA3BqUjFo6lr1PPoJ7xursEwwI0qWuS8n9T+z0M84A3xgUq LKE5LnD6r9J61sco6GQMTOrFgd8FzA0Qq1v48meX9Yl8bBOcTpKB0ULf52FOWctPvw aK7S1K+9YpwkpBSnHNwYMzV8W1LtbgB5JgiR7JtXhRaTZyLlkdHXiKthNJITvanvJh k6iXLWOW74/bg== Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:43:59 +0000 From: Eric Biggers To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, conor.dooley@microchip.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu, Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions Message-ID: References: <20230329140642.2186644-1-heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230329140642.2186644-1-heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230329_114409_034781_35155E45 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.08 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Heiko, On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions Has there been consideration of implementing AES-GCM instead of GHASH by itself? This is what arm64 does, for example. There is not currently any use case for GHASH outside of AES-GCM, and it's more efficient to implement the full AES-GCM. - Eric _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv