public inbox for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: "chenjiahao (C)" <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, guoren@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	bjorn@rivosinc.com, alex@ghiti.fr, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	atishp@rivosinc.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
	horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low]
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 07:32:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCYcJos4MLBvpP9/@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8a32e3c-c083-20de-16d1-f628b02b739b@huawei.com>

On 03/30/23 at 09:40pm, chenjiahao (C) wrote:
......
> Agreed, I will clean this up later in next version.
> > > +		if (ret || !crash_size)
> > > +			return;
> > > +
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * crashkernel=Y,low is valid only when crashkernel=X,high
> > > +		 * is passed and high memory is reserved successful.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		ret = parse_crashkernel_low(boot_command_line, 0, &crash_low_size, &crash_base);
> > > +		if (ret == -ENOENT)
> > > +			crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> > > +		else if (ret)
> > > +			return;
> > > +
> > > +		search_start = dma32_phys_limit;
> > > +	} else if (ret || !crash_size) {
> > > +		/* Invalid argument value specified */
> > >   		return;
> > > +	}
> > >   	crash_size = PAGE_ALIGN(crash_size);
> > > @@ -1201,16 +1246,26 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> > >   	 */
> > >   	crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, PMD_SIZE,
> > >   					       search_start,
> > > -					       min(search_end, (unsigned long) SZ_4G));
> > > +					       min(search_end, (unsigned long)dma32_phys_limit));
> > >   	if (crash_base == 0) {
> > The above conditional check isn't right. If crashkernel=size@offset
> > specified, the reservation failure won't trigger retry. This seems to be
> > originally introduced by old commit, while this need be fixed firstly.
> 
> Just a little curious about the rule to cope with this specific case. If
> "crashkernel=size@offset" was passed
> 
> but reserve failed, should try again to allocate in high memory, regardless
> the specified size@offset,
> 
> or just throw a warning and return? Since I noticed the current logic here
> on Arm64 is to check if !fixed_base first

Yeah, we need mark the "crashkernel=size@offset" case and avoid to
retry. Because you won't succeed if  memblock has already failed to
reserve an unavailable memory region, retry is meaningless. This has
been done in x86, arm64.


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-28 11:51 [PATCH -next v2 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Chen Jiahao
2023-03-28 11:51 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/2] riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low] Chen Jiahao
2023-03-29 11:19   ` Baoquan He
2023-03-30 13:40     ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-30 23:32       ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-03-31 11:36         ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-03-28 11:51 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/2] docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for riscv Chen Jiahao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZCYcJos4MLBvpP9/@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox