From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
thomas@t-8ch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] selftests/nolibc: always print the log file
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 06:20:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZH1ioKUVOYGgDUj7@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <835e118943d257b7a83066fb4fb77c0e5cf71534.1685936428.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:57:44AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> This allows to check the other issues of the output file manually even
> when all of them passed.
Till now I preferred not to see it when everything was OK since it was
useless and permitted a quick visual check in the reports. Do you
really think it's useful ? If others prefer it that way we can change
it but I purposely added this test to "improve" the output (for me at
least). I'm interested in opinions here.
Willy
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-05 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-05 3:47 [PATCH 0/4] selftests/nolibc: fix up and improve test report Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-05 3:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests/nolibc: add a test-report target Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-05 4:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-05 6:54 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-07 5:52 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-07 12:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-07 14:15 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-05 3:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests/nolibc: allow run test-report directly Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-05 3:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/nolibc: always print the log file Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-05 4:20 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2023-06-05 7:05 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-05 3:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/nolibc: fix up test-report for run target Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-05 4:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-06-05 6:32 ` [PATCH 0/4] selftests/nolibc: fix up and improve test report Willy Tarreau
2023-06-05 10:53 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-06 4:50 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZH1ioKUVOYGgDUj7@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=falcon@tinylab.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox