From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28823C77B73 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 04:50:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=owNd0T51EFHYU9hfIhljGMb7ANzSmBnWl0V2fuR+JwY=; b=MvRJq8YbeIfqdt KcCX7fkR4jhJoQFlVza7nB2Gg0M2zkMNYkTUbRZpbsC/aJKmC441of9L2tvChBT4jBDa/4xBUVSRf UkQGZU/YJ/KU+rEMiDgcspgw2+IgqgZEPJWkpiWyaaqYolcNmHa1g1Td3SRyLCCWVDIeBdb5YzXll Xe9bH7yexl3cGOwccaZY0w74kWCsxvd12nqpi7TrjUAZjrRbEOSRbBtcjlRJoUOc3N08bHB6l2gkg ojxOp/8V13DehkShzMYLuaOYqHca902mpHOw6UdSIKs7y+/TF/4KYaCKVtKbGyKXXt4gAlJhyWeMq n7oZRhDb6eGpM0JLJGfg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q6Oeg-000Aub-32; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 04:50:50 +0000 Received: from ded1.1wt.eu ([163.172.96.212] helo=1wt.eu) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q6Oed-000Atz-2K for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 04:50:49 +0000 Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 3564od2B017477; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:50:39 +0200 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:50:39 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Zhangjin Wu Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, thomas@t-8ch.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] selftests/nolibc: fix up and improve test report Message-ID: References: <20230605105332.245553-1-falcon@tinylab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230605105332.245553-1-falcon@tinylab.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230605_215048_620509_8A62050B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:47:41AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > > > Thanks very much for your merge of the v3 generic part1 of rv32, just > > > tested your latest 20230604-nolibc-rv32+stkp6 branch, everything work > > > well except a trivial test report regression on the 'run' target. > > (...) > > > > I've squashed your fix into the pending patch and pushed branch > > 20230605-nolibc-rv32+stkp7. I have only tested userland (I really > > need to leave now, no time for a kernel build). > > > > Just did kernel build + nolibc test for arm, aarch64 and rv64, no regressions > found. Much appreciated, thank you. This evening I'll try the remaining archs as I already have the cross-compilers, then will give Paul the go. Cheers, Willy _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv