* [PATCH] Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs.
@ 2024-04-11 19:18 enh
2024-04-22 16:08 ` Charlie Jenkins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: enh @ 2024-04-11 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, Paul Walmsley, linux-riscv
These only tell you about scalar accesses, not vector accesses.
Signed-off-by: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
---
Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
index b2bcc9eed9aa..239be63f5089 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
@@ -192,21 +192,21 @@ The following keys are defined:
information about the selected set of processors.
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN`: The performance of misaligned
- accesses is unknown.
+ scalar accesses is unknown.
- * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned accesses are
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned scalar
accesses are
emulated via software, either in or below the kernel. These accesses are
always extremely slow.
- * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned accesses are slower
- than equivalent byte accesses. Misaligned accesses may be supported
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
+ slower than equivalent byte accesses. Misaligned accesses may be supported
directly in hardware, or trapped and emulated by software.
- * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned accesses are faster
- than equivalent byte accesses.
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
+ faster than equivalent byte accesses.
- * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned accesses are
- not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned scalar accesses
+ are not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which
represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes.
--
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs.
2024-04-11 19:18 [PATCH] Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs enh
@ 2024-04-22 16:08 ` Charlie Jenkins
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Charlie Jenkins @ 2024-04-22 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: enh; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Palmer Dabbelt, Paul Walmsley,
linux-riscv
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:18:25PM -0700, enh wrote:
> These only tell you about scalar accesses, not vector accesses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> index b2bcc9eed9aa..239be63f5089 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
> @@ -192,21 +192,21 @@ The following keys are defined:
> information about the selected set of processors.
>
> * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN`: The performance of misaligned
> - accesses is unknown.
> + scalar accesses is unknown.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned accesses are
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED`: Misaligned scalar
> accesses are
> emulated via software, either in or below the kernel. These accesses are
> always extremely slow.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned accesses are slower
> - than equivalent byte accesses. Misaligned accesses may be supported
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
> + slower than equivalent byte accesses. Misaligned accesses may be supported
> directly in hardware, or trapped and emulated by software.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned accesses are faster
> - than equivalent byte accesses.
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST`: Misaligned scalar accesses are
> + faster than equivalent byte accesses.
>
> - * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned accesses are
> - not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
> + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned scalar accesses
> + are not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
>
> * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which
> represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes.
> --
> 2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
- Charlie
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-22 16:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-11 19:18 [PATCH] Clarify risc-v hwprobe RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_* docs enh
2024-04-22 16:08 ` Charlie Jenkins
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox