Linux-RISC-V Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 14:18:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlSIH1/etwPQe+bQ@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28114882-f8d7-21bf-4536-a186e8d7a22a@w6rz.net>

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 03:45:15AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:09:14PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:47:55AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > Report an error when an attempt to register a clkdev entry results in a
> > > truncated string so the problem can be easily spotted.
> > >
> > > Reported by: Duanqiang Wen <duanqiangwen@net-swift.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> >
> > With this patch in the mainline kernel, I get
> >
> > 10000000.clock-controller:corepll: device ID is greater than 24
> > sifive-clk-prci 10000000.clock-controller: Failed to register clkdev for
> corepll: -12
> > sifive-clk-prci 10000000.clock-controller: could not register clocks: -12
> > sifive-clk-prci 10000000.clock-controller: probe with driver
> sifive-clk-prci failed with error -12
> > ...
> > platform 10060000.gpio: deferred probe pending: platform: supplier
> 10000000.clock-controller not ready
> > platform 10010000.serial: deferred probe pending: platform: supplier
> 10000000.clock-controller not ready
> > platform 10011000.serial: deferred probe pending: platform: supplier
> 10000000.clock-controller not ready
> > platform 10040000.spi: deferred probe pending: platform: supplier
> 10000000.clock-controller not ready
> > platform 10050000.spi: deferred probe pending: platform: supplier
> 10000000.clock-controller not ready
> > platform 10090000.ethernet: deferred probe pending: platform: supplier
> 10000000.clock-controller not ready
> >
> > when trying to boot sifive_u in qemu.
> >
> > Apparently, "10000000.clock-controller" is too long. Any suggestion on
> > how to solve the problem ? I guess using dev_name(dev) as dev_id parameter
> > for clk_hw_register_clkdev() is not or no longer a good idea.
> > What else should be used instead ?
> 
> This issue causes a complete boot failure on real hardware (SiFive
> Unmatched). The boot only gets as far as "Starting kernel ..." with no other
> indication of what's going on.
> 
> Guenter's suggested patch solves the issue.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c
> b/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c
> index 25b8e1a80ddc..20cc8f42d9eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/sifive-prci.c
> @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int __prci_register_clocks(struct device *dev,
> struct __prci_data *pd,
>                          return r;
>                  }
> 
> -               r = clk_hw_register_clkdev(&pic->hw, pic->name,
> dev_name(dev));
> +               r = clk_hw_register_clkdev(&pic->hw, pic->name, "prci");

How about just changing this to:

		r = clk_hw_register(dev, &pic->hw);

?

Since, if the device name is over-sized and thus truncated in the clk
lookup array that clkdev maintains, *nothing* will be able to match
the entry. Hence, I suspect all those clkdev registrations are
completely redundant for this driver (and do nothing other than
waste memory!)

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-27 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-27 10:45 [PATCH] clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev Ron Economos
2024-05-27 11:16 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-05-27 12:57   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-27 13:18 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-05-27 13:24   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-27 13:30     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-28  8:15 ` [PATCH] clk: clkdev: don't fail clkdev_alloc() if over-sized Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-28 11:21   ` Ron Economos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZlSIH1/etwPQe+bQ@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=re@w6rz.net \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox