From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9979C3DA49 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:43:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=HbhKR+1GmOHtsOyyNfMcDkv8DOYQaz1LsE8xKwm45mM=; b=iyF51LFKNikZCh GaUWxHe4sfreCVzION3lBbfhxoYGaCfp90h/1zqIAEQjMMufVzBmUR2fUrdYlHWS+AHNDuxZJMVYW LI2vScjQSi6EowWUeCVwYqDTWaD64Dcu5zwZ2DEHVc44NNliRktvlg610Gx761akFEU4+QIk2VBpH GOqofJlKrP9ngvj0CqryZpoyCvj67hkicSM5IyNxpWZtwi1iyu44zINAiKZhewVtV26fED2HXvrE+ ZkzbMsIN02DrWLrtAP7U2hxtIE4jcitGpNRStmO0OviWn3fWz5GySiHq2ixhOuCqqY/c/t2BMV6j6 7OtqsRWFPzsJIH+5h0+w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sUSM6-0000000HJ49-0v2I; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:43:38 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sUSLi-0000000HIwS-0ev1 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:43:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1721313793; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gJrnZFWbEYDfYCgkGw1MmmGbtaUVBD+dZ8bSRNzGKmo=; b=cw1dgBqBUuQO0L/Rt8oi3gAzRiWDfQHJWDYrJr1ODFPscU0PayRYtm3tsPu9DaR/krsVj0 SGAbaFRnzX23JC4d3OCA35dLXwjnDNppIt8C2h7vo1kOwlBCwVxviiQUyz1Wu60gxiiGqn TKC2/abPROYbApGz4M19kDxUpKOA8xQ= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-41-wwEfdrw0NfmVBBmg15EUHg-1; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:43:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wwEfdrw0NfmVBBmg15EUHg-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553071954223; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.72.112.39]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B42773000185; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 22:42:42 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Jinjie Ruan Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, afd@ti.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, eric.devolder@oracle.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, javierm@redhat.com, deller@gmx.de, robh@kernel.org, hbathini@linux.ibm.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, chenjiahao16@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] crash: Fix x86_32 crash memory reserve dead loop bug at high Message-ID: References: <20240718035444.2977105-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20240718035444.2977105-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240718_074314_277844_4813A1F9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.19 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 07/18/24 at 08:10pm, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > > > On 2024/7/18 19:14, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 07/18/24 at 11:54am, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > > > > I don't fully catch the subject, what does the 'dead loop bug at high' > > mean? > > It means alloc at [CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX] repeatedly > which corresponds to the crashkernel parameter of the "high". That may mislead people to think it's a crashkernel=,high setting and the corresponding issue. Maybe "crash: Fix x86_32 crashkernel reservation dead loop" is good enough. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv