From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: reject out-of-range relocation target indices
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:59:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8f29668-be71-4679-a95d-55dfbd9b5c61@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908230815.78409-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com>
On 9/9/26 01:08, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> apply_relocations() skips relocation sections whose sh_info target index
> is outside the section table. ARM, ARM64, LoongArch, PA-RISC and RISC-V
> use sh_info earlier in module_frob_arch_sections(), before this check.
>
> ARM, ARM64, LoongArch and RISC-V use the unchecked index to read
> sh_flags outside the section header table. PA-RISC uses it to index an
> e_shnum-sized heap array for a read and an update. QEMU reproduced
> page-fault Oopses on ARM, ARM64, LoongArch and RISC-V, and a Data TLB
> miss on the PA-RISC array read.
>
> Validate sh_info for SHT_REL and SHT_RELA sections in
> elf_validity_cache_sechdrs(). Reject the module with ENOEXEC before
> architecture code can use the index.
>
> Fixes: c298be74492b ("parisc: fix module loading failure of large kernel modules")
> Fixes: 7d485f647c1f ("ARM: 8220/1: allow modules outside of bl range")
> Fixes: fd045f6cd98e ("arm64: add support for module PLTs")
> Fixes: ab1ef68e5401 ("RISC-V: Add sections of PLT and GOT for kernel module")
> Fixes: fcdfe9d22bed ("LoongArch: Add ELF and module support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> A custom harness for upstream Frama-C 33.0 (Arsenic) Eva found the
> ARM32 instance in a source-identical ARM module_frob_arch_sections()
> slice. Eva reported the out-of-range section-table pointer and sh_flags
> access.
>
> The analysis and ARM32 A/B test ran at Linux b9b3e33b70b7 ("Merge tag
> 'trace-v7.2-rc6' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace"). The
> PA-RISC, ARM64, RISC-V, LoongArch and x86_64 A/B tests ran at the
> declared base commit, 28924df2a08f. arch/arm/kernel/module-plts.c and
> the touched loop in kernel/module/main.c are identical between the two
> commits.
>
> Each A/B test changed only a relocation section's sh_info to
> 0x10000000. The same configurations and modules were used before and
> after the change. All controls loaded before and after the change. The
> fixed kernels rejected the malformed modules with ENOEXEC.
>
> Original-kernel results with QEMU 10.2.1 TCG:
>
> - ARM32, virt/Cortex-A15, GCC 15.2.0, multi_v7_defconfig plus
> VMSPLIT_2G: page fault at module_frob_arch_sections()+0x160.
> - ARM64, virt/Cortex-A57, GCC 15.2.0, defconfig: page fault at
> module_frob_arch_sections()+0x110.
> - PA-RISC, B160L, hppa-linux-gcc 8.1.0, binutils 2.30,
> generic-32bit_defconfig: Data TLB miss at
> module_frob_arch_sections()+0x11c on the stub_entries read for a
> counted R_PARISC_PCREL17F relocation.
> - RISC-V, virt, GCC 15.2.0, defconfig plus RELOCATABLE with
> MODULE_SECTIONS enabled: page fault at
> module_frob_arch_sections()+0xe4.
> - LoongArch, virt/LA464, LLVM 21.1.8, loongson64_defconfig: page fault
> at module_frob_arch_sections()+0x1b8.
>
> On x86_64, which has no vulnerable early sh_info access, the original
> kernel loaded both modules. The fixed kernel loaded the control and
> rejected the malformed module with ENOEXEC. The test used pc/qemu64,
> x86_64_defconfig and GCC 15.2.0.
Interesting.
So, this patch helps to prevent loading modules with buggy entries,
even if the module was e.g. loaded on x86-64 before.
For me the patch is OK, but it only adds one random sanitizing check,
and where would we stop to check?
> ---
> kernel/module/main.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index d0e1e0bd2ad0..30c7a05488bc 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -1933,6 +1933,7 @@ static int elf_validity_ehdr(const struct load_info *info)
> * * Section array fits in the user provided data
> * * Section index 0 is NULL
> * * Section contents are inbounds
> + * * Relocation section target indices are inbounds
> *
> * Then updates @info with a &load_info->sechdrs pointer if valid.
> *
> @@ -1983,6 +1984,12 @@ static int elf_validity_cache_sechdrs(struct load_info *info)
> /* Validate contents are inbounds */
> for (i = 1; i < info->hdr->e_shnum; i++) {
> shdr = &sechdrs[i];
> + if ((shdr->sh_type == SHT_REL || shdr->sh_type == SHT_RELA) &&
> + shdr->sh_info >= info->hdr->e_shnum) {
> + pr_err("Invalid ELF relocation section target index %u\n",
> + shdr->sh_info);
Suggestion:
Print the module name too, otherwise it's hard to find out later which module is broken.
Helge
> + return -ENOEXEC;
> + }
> switch (shdr->sh_type) {
> case SHT_NULL:
> case SHT_NOBITS:
>
> base-commit: 28924df2a08f440c73991b83028032c901de2ae4
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 23:08 [PATCH] module: reject out-of-range relocation target indices Karl Mehltretter
2026-09-10 10:59 ` Helge Deller [this message]
2026-09-10 12:30 ` Petr Pavlu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8f29668-be71-4679-a95d-55dfbd9b5c61@gmx.de \
--to=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox