From: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu,
ebiederm@xmission.com, heiko@sntech.de, vitaly.wool@konsulko.com,
tongtiangen@huawei.com, guoren@kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: Add fixup to support fast call of crash_kexec()
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:46:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1098514-d185-e649-6dea-3c2f01e97ea8@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2a45f97-0f97-6621-bb7e-11f51282c468@huawei.com>
在 2022/6/7 上午9:21, Kefeng Wang 写道:
>
> On 2022/6/6 20:37, Xianting Tian wrote:
>> Currently, almost all archs (x86, arm64, mips...) support fast call
>> of crash_kexec() when "regs && kexec_should_crash()" is true. But
>> RISC-V not, it can only enter crash system via panic(). However panic()
>> doesn't pass the regs of the real accident scene to crash_kexec(),
>> it caused we can't get accurate backtrace via gdb,
>> $ riscv64-linux-gnu-gdb vmlinux vmcore
>> Reading symbols from vmlinux...
>> [New LWP 95]
>> #0 console_unlock () at kernel/printk/printk.c:2557
>> 2557 if (do_cond_resched)
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 console_unlock () at kernel/printk/printk.c:2557
>> #1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>
>> With the patch we can get the accurate backtrace,
>> $ riscv64-linux-gnu-gdb vmlinux vmcore
>> Reading symbols from vmlinux...
>> [New LWP 95]
>> #0 0xffffffe00063a4e0 in test_thread (data=<optimized out>) at
>> drivers/test_crash.c:81
>> 81 *(int *)p = 0xdead;
>> (gdb)
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0xffffffe00064d5c0 in test_thread (data=<optimized out>) at
>> drivers/test_crash.c:81
>> #1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>
>> Test code to produce NULL address dereference in test_crash.c,
>> void *p = NULL;
>> *(int *)p = 0xdead;
>>
>> Fixes: 76d2a0493a17 ("RISC-V: Init and Halt Code")
>> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v1:
>> - simplify the commit message
>> Changes from v2:
>> - add fixup in title
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> index b40426509244..39d0f8bba4b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>> +#include <linux/kexec.h>
>> #include <asm/asm-prototypes.h>
>> #include <asm/bug.h>
>> @@ -44,6 +45,9 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
>> ret = notify_die(DIE_OOPS, str, regs, 0, regs->cause, SIGSEGV);
>> + if (regs && kexec_should_crash(current))
>> + crash_kexec(regs);
>> +
>
> It seems that the regs won't be null, right? except that,
Autually both regs won't be null, But if it is triggered by panic() ,
the regs are got via riscv_crash_save_regs(), which are the regs of that
moment, but not the real accident scene.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>
>> bust_spinlocks(0);
>> add_taint(TAINT_DIE, LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE);
>> spin_unlock_irq(&die_lock);
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-07 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-06 12:37 [PATCH v3] RISC-V: Add fixup to support fast call of crash_kexec() Xianting Tian
2022-06-07 1:21 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-06-07 1:46 ` Xianting Tian [this message]
2022-06-17 6:40 ` Xianting Tian
2022-06-17 7:13 ` Guo Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1098514-d185-e649-6dea-3c2f01e97ea8@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
--cc=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
--cc=vitaly.wool@konsulko.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox