From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79E54C77B75 for ; Mon, 15 May 2023 12:48:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZVmGem4gnvC82kl3Ru1cw+BFFHRRF7NxSXxX0wsqxdk=; b=jsPSpPluix/F1o 0QVmMNyBfCUueMj3Swd3PqeMcqSHtTCybz2kSIU53FQu63QISpA/0o+GYZJX3EpNg88F2OjY/G9kL UHS8dacisrJcBOAHbEb70p6Z68OkBlRODk0vShoFnzqzV30ssSdBa5NDNEPlRSo+S+sY+ZSGwocdl hqiTOBldSbs8EHH5fLsHSZTV6p63/wsUi0SoY5qrAmnnC778mpYKzS8/WIgEHd8aX3WNEsbAOMRjG WEJLvJZ5zxBwGpbRWpgDVrx3/EXY2sjLqSrvMyhlnmjYkK41fd8Hwflc9jR/BxgnHOsPmpaVyXDiW m5wbazAhGfj8UC3vvWNg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pyXcc-0029z8-2i; Mon, 15 May 2023 12:48:14 +0000 Received: from fd01.gateway.ufhost.com ([61.152.239.71]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pyXcY-0029ve-0K for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 12:48:13 +0000 Received: from EXMBX165.cuchost.com (unknown [175.102.18.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "EXMBX165", Issuer "EXMBX165" (not verified)) by fd01.gateway.ufhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41255807C; Mon, 15 May 2023 20:47:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) by EXMBX165.cuchost.com (172.16.6.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Mon, 15 May 2023 20:47:35 +0800 Received: from [192.168.125.124] (113.72.146.187) by EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Mon, 15 May 2023 20:47:34 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 20:47:33 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ASoC: starfive: Add JH7110 TDM driver Content-Language: en-US To: Mark Brown CC: Liam Girdwood , Claudiu Beznea , Jaroslav Kysela , "Takashi Iwai" , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Emil Renner Berthing , , , , References: <20230511091549.28003-1-walker.chen@starfivetech.com> <20230511091549.28003-3-walker.chen@starfivetech.com> <21bc5b06-3d3e-5a30-a90d-ea9f7abc6575@starfivetech.com> From: Walker Chen In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [113.72.146.187] X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCAS062.cuchost.com (172.16.6.22) To EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) X-YovoleRuleAgent: yovoleflag X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230515_054810_445211_8F569EC1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.85 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2023/5/15 18:51, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 04:29:07PM +0800, Walker Chen wrote: > >> I have submitted new version of patch for TDM driver. Could you please help to review and give your comments? > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches > for the subsystem are normally handled. Hi Mark, Sorry for that! Please forgive me for asking so eagerly. I will pay attention to this in the future. Best regards, Walker _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv