[PATCH v3 13/26] x86/numa_emu: simplify allocation of phys_dist

Mike Rapoport
2024-08-01T06:16:28Z

From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>

By the time numa_emulation() is called, all physical memory is already
mapped in the direct map and there is no need to define limits for
memblock allocation.

Replace memblock_phys_alloc_range() with memblock_alloc().

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
---
arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
index 1ce22e315b80..439804e21962 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
@@ -448,15 +448,11 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)

/* copy the physical distance table */
if (numa_dist_cnt) {
- u64 phys;
-
- phys = memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_size, PAGE_SIZE, 0,
- PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped));
- if (!phys) {
+ phys_dist = memblock_alloc(phys_size, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (!phys_dist) {
pr_warn("NUMA: Warning: can't allocate copy of distance table, disabling emulation\n");
goto no_emu;
}
- phys_dist = __va(phys);

for (i = 0; i < numa_dist_cnt; i++)
for (j = 0; j < numa_dist_cnt; j++)
--
2.43.0