From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multigrain timestamps do not work on RISC-V
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:20:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mvmikpx4jw4.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mvmv7ty3pd8.fsf@suse.de> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:07:15 +0100")
On Jan 29 2025, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> My guess would be that something in inode_set_ctime_current is going
> wrong.
The bug is in the arch_cmpxchg macros in <asm/cmpxchg.h>, they mishandle
atomic exchange of u32 values:
# fs/inode.c:2802: if (cns == now.tv_nsec && inode->i_ctime_sec == now.tv_sec) {
#NO_APP
ld a5,-96(s0) # _33, now.tv_nsec
# fs/inode.c:2802: if (cns == now.tv_nsec && inode->i_ctime_sec == now.tv_sec) {
slli a4,s2,32 #, _49, cns
srli a4,a4,32 #, _49, _49
# fs/inode.c:2802: if (cns == now.tv_nsec && inode->i_ctime_sec == now.tv_sec) {
beq a4,a5,.L1248 #, _49, _33,
.L1205:
addi a3,s1,120 #, __ai_ptr, inode
.L1221:
# fs/inode.c:2809: if (try_cmpxchg(&inode->i_ctime_nsec, &cur, now.tv_nsec)) {
#APP
# 2809 "fs/inode.c" 1
0: lr.w a2, 0(a3) # __ret, *__ai_ptr_20
bne a2, a4, 1f # __ret, _49
Here the unsigned extended value of cur (a4) is compared with the sign
extended value of inode->i_ctime_nsec (a2). They cannot match if cur
has I_CTIME_QUERIED set (the sign bit). The lr/sc loop is exited before
the store conditional is executed.
sc.w.rl a1, a5, 0(a3) # __rc, _33, *__ai_ptr_20
bnez a1, 0b # __rc
fence rw,rw
1:
# 0 "" 2
#NO_APP
sext.w a5,a2 # __ret, __ret
A redundant sign extension of the current contents of inode->i_ctime_nsec.
# fs/inode.c:2809: if (try_cmpxchg(&inode->i_ctime_nsec, &cur, now.tv_nsec)) {
bne a5,s2,.L1211 #, __ret, cns,
Here the sign extended value of inode->i_ctime_nsec (a5) is compared
with the sign extended expected value (s2). They match, and try_cmpxchg
returns true, but the store never happend.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 10:07 Multigrain timestamps do not work on RISC-V Andreas Schwab
2025-01-29 17:20 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2025-01-29 23:06 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-29 23:28 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-30 9:29 ` Andreas Schwab
2025-01-29 23:03 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mvmikpx4jw4.fsf@suse.de \
--to=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).