From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 144CCC25B74 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 02:45:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From :Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=LSsIkBR+fGFBmYgS0AnNCbboBxmOJ+e0T0RwdrLYuwE=; b=wDrEi3UTfjNA24ygQ0sJKs5Jgq xq0rYKiyQy7+tdugO34vuPkg8kNxNsS7h+gRukC4KInpg+Dbjf2J53RDBuQQUoDFxatJtMb/DKQDj fmToRtfwpi1uWcEqwZg786t+dqRmWAEGi5Ps6TQrVyk7wbSqoz+IhjxxNrS6HlJaWvCgJby2XhlFt rMmyqbgLdv4JCYrBNGeegUwLOCkV/PvfW41mDy78DpJ9qkdOHTXwpLHPThDkkQOmXolSThQhfhgNG j+WEu0wKnNm5yHTBPuSw7+SIk5+GbR6QGDmxI2Cp3MXKdRHAzGq6IuQMK46AG+fp/y52Y0tDwX+6L HJmFKiJw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sCsGv-000000093J4-2KVv; Fri, 31 May 2024 02:45:37 +0000 Received: from mail.manjaro.org ([2a01:4f8:c0c:51f3::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sCsGr-000000093IU-32iO; Fri, 31 May 2024 02:45:35 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1717123530; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Q5Xxa+1pfjc83KgBzGxQW/9sLaAlfMtTgcdj5otYUxQ=; b=SNAYiZtNgZqRk9A1Opklu3S3DISvQzvdiQsIwR+hxLJwn3EvkM1U0oc4W5FDaYKz5KfM6c E/QhLW+EYIHy0+wN3Lk34YIaYl0fnzuTr+hGczp5TBmFjlsafAnBHmjeDmQ30NVFhL6DUa mTcPkotcL1rEazPuEg8KQ44s8AsVIdwQXZbiwZqJba9gbqT7RvVwROCJAVVi2fQ5Aa/1vs X0+mjKUw+xJyVBYMhvgDxVoihnSyX7qUMbEe57qOJ7dNHF/rNGV5pD74o8NdfuMXhGNH5m udPdca5v8xsOKerjRU+/jdYjE1W8zgyRmv2a9rqiXHxil18UeXtkJv4VvAGx4w== Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 04:45:28 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Diederik de Haas Cc: Alexey Charkov , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, wens@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Make preparations for per-RK3588-variant OPPs In-Reply-To: <511137f077495007f467d5927f42f85d@manjaro.org> References: <673dcf47596e7bc8ba065034e339bb1bbf9cdcb0.1716948159.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <9996796.SDjBYy7pSV@bagend> <511137f077495007f467d5927f42f85d@manjaro.org> Message-ID: <06452ce330f0a712e4d765475c6cbc8b@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240530_194534_260686_40D10E5F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2024-05-29 13:33, Dragan Simic wrote: > On 2024-05-29 13:09, Diederik de Haas wrote: >> On Wednesday, 29 May 2024 11:57:45 CEST Alexey Charkov wrote: [...] >>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi | 414 +-- >>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588j.dtsi | 6 +- >>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 2671 +---------------- >>> >>> Rename detection didn't do a particularly great job here - wonder if >>> we can do anything about it to minimize the patch size and ensure >>> that >>> the change history is preserved for git blame... >> >> +1 >> The diff does look awfully big for a rename operation, which was >> supposed to >> (also only) "modify ... a bit". > > I also don't like the size of the patch. I just tried playing with > specifying different values for the --find-renames and --find-copies > options, but with no good results. I'll have a look into the Git > source later, to see what's actually going on with those options. Yay, --break-rewrites makes the diff extremely compact. :) [1] [1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-diff#Documentation/git-diff.txt--Bltngtltmgt _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip