public inbox for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	alberto.dassatti@heig-vd.ch
Cc: xxm@rock-chips.com, rick.wertenbroek@heig-vd.ch,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Mikko Kovanen" <mikko.kovanen@aavamobile.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] PCI: rockchip: Use u32 variable to access 32-bit registers
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:34:28 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fa5cef4-7096-7f59-422a-98011d01437c@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230214140858.1133292-9-rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>

On 2/14/23 23:08, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
> Previously u16 variables were used to access 32-bit registers, this
> resulted in not all of the data being read from the registers. Also
> the left shift of more than 16-bits would result in moving data out
> of the variable. Use u32 variables to access 32-bit registers
> 
> Fixes: cf590b078391 ("PCI: rockchip: Add EP driver for Rockchip PCIe controller")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 10 +++++-----
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h    |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> index ca5b363ba..b7865a94e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> @@ -292,15 +292,15 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_ep_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, u8 vfn,
>  {
>  	struct rockchip_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
>  	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = &ep->rockchip;
> -	u16 flags;
> +	u32 flags;
>  
>  	flags = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip,
>  				   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) +
>  				   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_REG);
>  	flags &= ~ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_MASK;
>  	flags |=
> -	   ((multi_msg_cap << 1) <<  ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_OFFSET) |
> -	   PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT;
> +	   (multi_msg_cap << ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_OFFSET) |

ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_OFFSET is 17 and multi_msg_cap is a u8...
Not nice.

Locally, I added the local variable:

u32 mmc = multi_msg_cap;

And use mmc instead of multi_msg_cap to avoid issues. Also,

> +	   (PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT << ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_FLAGS_OFFSET);
>  	flags &= ~ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MASK_MSI_CAP;
>  	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, flags,
>  			    ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) +
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_ep_get_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, u8 vfn)
>  {
>  	struct rockchip_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
>  	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = &ep->rockchip;
> -	u16 flags;
> +	u32 flags;
>  
>  	flags = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip,
>  				   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) +
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_ep_send_msi_irq(struct rockchip_pcie_ep *ep, u8 fn,
>  					 u8 interrupt_num)
>  {
>  	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = &ep->rockchip;
> -	u16 flags, mme, data, data_mask;
> +	u32 flags, mme, data, data_mask;
>  	u8 msi_count;
>  	u64 pci_addr, pci_addr_mask = 0xff;
>  	u32 r;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index e90c2a2b8..11dbf53cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@
>  #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_CMD_STATUS			0x4
>  #define   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_CMD_STATUS_IS		BIT(19)
>  #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_REG			0x90
> +#define   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_FLAGS_OFFSET			16

You are not using this macro anywhere. The name is also not very
descriptive. Better have it as:

#define   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_ME		BIT(16)

to match the TRM name and be clear that the bit indicates if MSI is
enabled or not.

>  #define   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_OFFSET		17
>  #define   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_MASK		GENMASK(19, 17)
>  #define   ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MME_OFFSET		20

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-15  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-14 14:08 [PATCH v2 0/9] PCI: rockchip: Fix RK3399 PCIe endpoint controller driver Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] PCI: rockchip: Remove writes to unused registers Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-14 23:56   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  9:04     ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-15  9:17       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  9:58       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16  7:28         ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16  8:43           ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-16  9:54             ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] PCI: rockchip: Write PCI Device ID to correct register Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-14 23:57   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] PCI: rockchip: Assert PCI Configuration Enable bit after probe Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-14 23:58   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] PCI: rockchip: Add poll and timeout to wait for PHY PLLs to be locked Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-15  1:01   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add dtsi entry for RK3399 PCIe endpoint core Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-15  1:03   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] PCI: rockchip: Fix window mapping and address translation for endpoint Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-15  1:20   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] PCI: rockchip: Fix legacy IRQ generation for RK3399 PCIe endpoint core Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-15  1:26   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  2:38   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] PCI: rockchip: Use u32 variable to access 32-bit registers Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-15  1:34   ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-02-15 10:46     ` David Laight
2023-02-15 11:20       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-14 15:45     ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] PCI: rockchip: Add parameter check for RK3399 PCIe endpoint core set_msi() Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-15  1:39   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-21 10:47     ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-21 10:55       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-21 13:19         ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-21 16:37           ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-21 22:01             ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-21 21:57           ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  1:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] PCI: rockchip: Fix RK3399 PCIe endpoint controller driver Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15 10:28   ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-02-15 10:41     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-14  0:02 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-14  7:57   ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-03-14  8:10     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-14 14:53       ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-03-14 22:54         ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15  0:00           ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-16 12:52             ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-03-16 16:34               ` Rick Wertenbroek
2023-03-16 22:09                 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-04-13 13:49                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-04-13 14:34                     ` Rick Wertenbroek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0fa5cef4-7096-7f59-422a-98011d01437c@opensource.wdc.com \
    --to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=alberto.dassatti@heig-vd.ch \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mikko.kovanen@aavamobile.com \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@heig-vd.ch \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox