From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] clk: rockchip: fold pll init functions into a common one
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:11:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461849075-8310-8-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461849075-8310-1-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de>
The pll init functions are now all the same, so we can generalize them
into one common function used by all to save some duplication.
The parent-check in the original functions does not do anything useful
at all, as we're not doing any real rate-handling at this point anymore,
so can just go away.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
---
drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 125 ++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
index 5bd0545..1223eee 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
@@ -117,6 +117,32 @@ static int rockchip_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
return pll->data->set_params(pll, rate);
}
+static void rockchip_pll_init(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
+ const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate;
+ struct rockchip_pll_rate_table cur;
+ unsigned long drate;
+
+ if (!(pll->flags & ROCKCHIP_PLL_SYNC_RATE))
+ return;
+
+ drate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
+ rate = rockchip_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
+
+ /* when no rate setting for the current rate, rely on clk_set_rate */
+ if (!rate)
+ return;
+
+ pll->data->get_params(pll, &cur);
+
+ if (!pll->data->compare_params(pll, rate, &cur)) {
+ pr_debug("%s: pll %s: rate params do not match rate table, adjusting\n",
+ __func__, clk_hw_get_name(hw));
+ pll->data->set_params(pll, rate);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Wait for the pll to reach the locked state.
* The calling set_rate function is responsible for making sure the
@@ -320,39 +346,6 @@ static int rockchip_rk3036_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
return !(pllcon & RK3036_PLLCON1_PWRDOWN);
}
-static void rockchip_rk3036_pll_init(struct clk_hw *hw)
-{
- struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
- const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate;
- struct rockchip_pll_rate_table cur;
- unsigned long drate;
-
- if (!(pll->flags & ROCKCHIP_PLL_SYNC_RATE))
- return;
-
- drate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
- rate = rockchip_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
-
- /* when no rate setting for the current rate, rely on clk_set_rate */
- if (!rate)
- return;
-
- pll->data->get_params(pll, &cur);
- if (!pll->data->compare_params(pll, rate, &cur)) {
- struct clk *parent = clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
-
- if (!parent) {
- pr_warn("%s: parent of %s not available\n",
- __func__, __clk_get_name(hw->clk));
- return;
- }
-
- pr_debug("%s: pll %s: rate params do not match rate table, adjusting\n",
- __func__, __clk_get_name(hw->clk));
- pll->data->set_params(pll, rate);
- }
-}
-
static const struct rockchip_pll_data rockchip_rk3036_pll_data = {
.get_params = rockchip_rk3036_pll_get_params,
.set_params = rockchip_rk3036_pll_set_params,
@@ -373,7 +366,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3036_pll_clk_ops = {
.enable = rockchip_rk3036_pll_enable,
.disable = rockchip_rk3036_pll_disable,
.is_enabled = rockchip_rk3036_pll_is_enabled,
- .init = rockchip_rk3036_pll_init,
+ .init = rockchip_pll_init,
};
/**
@@ -539,32 +532,6 @@ static int rockchip_rk3066_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
return !(pllcon & RK3066_PLLCON3_PWRDOWN);
}
-static void rockchip_rk3066_pll_init(struct clk_hw *hw)
-{
- struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
- const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate;
- struct rockchip_pll_rate_table cur;
- unsigned long drate;
-
- if (!(pll->flags & ROCKCHIP_PLL_SYNC_RATE))
- return;
-
- drate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
- rate = rockchip_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
-
- /* when no rate setting for the current rate, rely on clk_set_rate */
- if (!rate)
- return;
-
- pll->data->get_params(pll, &cur);
-
- if (!pll->data->compare_params(pll, rate, &cur)) {
- pr_debug("%s: pll %s: rate params do not match rate table, adjusting\n",
- __func__, clk_hw_get_name(hw));
- pll->data->set_params(pll, rate);
- }
-}
-
static const struct rockchip_pll_data rockchip_rk3066_pll_data = {
.get_params = rockchip_rk3066_pll_get_params,
.set_params = rockchip_rk3066_pll_set_params,
@@ -585,7 +552,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3066_pll_clk_ops = {
.enable = rockchip_rk3066_pll_enable,
.disable = rockchip_rk3066_pll_disable,
.is_enabled = rockchip_rk3066_pll_is_enabled,
- .init = rockchip_rk3066_pll_init,
+ .init = rockchip_pll_init,
};
/**
@@ -785,40 +752,6 @@ static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
return !(pllcon & RK3399_PLLCON3_PWRDOWN);
}
-static void rockchip_rk3399_pll_init(struct clk_hw *hw)
-{
- struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
- const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate;
- struct rockchip_pll_rate_table cur;
- unsigned long drate;
-
- if (!(pll->flags & ROCKCHIP_PLL_SYNC_RATE))
- return;
-
- drate = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
- rate = rockchip_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
-
- /* when no rate setting for the current rate, rely on clk_set_rate */
- if (!rate)
- return;
-
- pll->data->get_params(pll, &cur);
-
- if (!pll->data->compare_params(pll, rate, &cur)) {
- struct clk *parent = clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
-
- if (!parent) {
- pr_warn("%s: parent of %s not available\n",
- __func__, __clk_get_name(hw->clk));
- return;
- }
-
- pr_debug("%s: pll %s: rate params do not match rate table, adjusting\n",
- __func__, __clk_get_name(hw->clk));
- pll->data->set_params(pll, rate);
- }
-}
-
static const struct rockchip_pll_data rockchip_rk3399_pll_data = {
.get_params = rockchip_rk3399_pll_get_params,
.set_params = rockchip_rk3399_pll_set_params,
@@ -839,7 +772,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3399_pll_clk_ops = {
.enable = rockchip_rk3399_pll_enable,
.disable = rockchip_rk3399_pll_disable,
.is_enabled = rockchip_rk3399_pll_is_enabled,
- .init = rockchip_rk3399_pll_init,
+ .init = rockchip_pll_init,
};
/*
--
2.6.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-28 13:11 [PATCH 0/7] clk: rockchip: cleanup some code duplication Heiko Stuebner
2016-04-28 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] clk: rockchip: lookup General Register Files in rockchip_clk_init Heiko Stuebner
2016-04-28 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/7] clk: rockchip: simplify GRF handling in pll clocks Heiko Stuebner
2016-04-28 13:11 ` [PATCH 3/7] clk: rockchip: drop old_rate calculation on pll rate changes Heiko Stuebner
2016-04-28 13:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] clk: rockchip: abstract pll get-params and set-params operations Heiko Stuebner
2016-05-06 22:55 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-05-08 20:24 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-05-09 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-04-28 13:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] clk: rockchip: generalize pll set-rate operation Heiko Stuebner
2016-04-28 13:11 ` [PATCH 6/7] clk: rockchip: move pll rate-comparison into a callable function Heiko Stuebner
2016-04-28 13:11 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2016-05-06 22:56 ` [PATCH 0/7] clk: rockchip: cleanup some code duplication Stephen Boyd
2016-05-09 14:28 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461849075-8310-8-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox