From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:43:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1474422233-29355-4-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1474422233-29355-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Per JESD84-B51 P69, Host need to change frequency to <=52MHz after
setting HS_TIMING to 0x1, and host may changes frequency to <= 200MHz
after setting HS_TIMING to 0x3. It seems there is no difference if
we don't change frequency to <= 52MHz as f_init is already less than
52MHz. But actually it does make difference. When doing compatibility
test we see failures for some eMMC devices without changing the
frequency to hs_max_dtr. And let's read the spec again, we could see
that "Host may changes frequency to 200MHz" implies that it's not
mandatory. But the "Host need to change frequency to <= 52MHz" implies
that we should do this.
Reported-by: Xiao Yao <xiaoyao@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
---
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index 3163bb9..989d37e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -1282,6 +1282,8 @@ static int mmc_select_hs400es(struct mmc_card *card)
if (err)
goto out_err;
+ mmc_set_clock(host, card->ext_csd.hs_max_dtr);
+
err = mmc_switch_status(card);
if (err)
goto out_err;
--
2.3.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-21 1:43 [PATCH 0/5] Some fixes for mmc core and sdhci/arasan Shawn Lin
2016-09-21 1:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] mmc: core: don't try to switch block size for dual rate mode Shawn Lin
2016-09-22 9:40 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-21 1:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] mmc: core: switch to 1V8 or 1V2 for hs400es mode Shawn Lin
2016-09-22 9:39 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-21 1:43 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2016-09-22 9:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] mmc: core: changes frequency to hs_max_dtr when selecting hs400es Ulf Hansson
2016-09-22 10:06 ` Shawn Lin
2016-09-22 10:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-22 23:34 ` Shawn Lin
2016-09-21 1:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] mmc: sdhci: Don't try to switch to unsupported voltage Shawn Lin
2016-09-21 1:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: add sdhci_arasan_voltage_switch for arasan,5.1 Shawn Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1474422233-29355-4-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox